LOS ANGELES DWP, MULHOLLAND AND MONO LAKE   Term Paper ID:39669 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Answers two questions about the Los Angeles aqueduct and Mono Lake and about water ...... More...

4 Pages / 900 Words 4 sources, 6 Citations, MLA Format $16.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Answers two questions about the Los Angeles aqueduct and Mono Lake and (2) about water rights, English Common Law and the Colorado Doctrine. Paper Introduction: Los Angeles DWP Mulholland and MOno Lake Introduction When Los Angeles was a small town in the mid s it recognized thatits limited water supply also limited its growth As the region attractedimmigration the need for a stable and secure water supply became moreobvious William Mulholland helped to lead the building of the Los AngelesAqueduct a project that was completed on-time and under budget and whichbrought water from northern California\'s Mono Lake to the southernCalifornia metropolitan area This project was not without Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. (2 6). Under the California Doctrine, water that isnot first used by riparian rights and which is used in a "reasonable"purpose can have its rights accrue to the entity that puts the reasonableuse in place. Retrieved 7 May 2 7 from: . (2 3, October). Stepping outside the box. Analysis The Los Angeles Aqueduct is actually two aqueducts; the first wascompleted in 1913 and the second in 197 . Rediscovering the Golden State: California Geography. Certainly the population of Los Angeles continues tobe dependent on imported water, and that is likely to continue for theforeseeable future (Davis, 1998). Los Angeles DWP, Mulholland and MOno Lake Introduction When Los Angeles was a small town in the mid-18 s, it recognized thatits limited water supply also limited its growth. This is alsoknown as the Colorado Doctrine and is common throughout the West (Hurd,2 3). William Mulholland helped to lead the building of the Los AngelesAqueduct, a project that was completed on-time and under budget, and whichbrought water from northern California's Mono Lake to the southernCalifornia metropolitan area. This project was not without controversy atthe time it was completed, in the early 19 s, and the controversy grewuntil it mushroomed nearly as much as the region's population by the lastquarter of the twentieth century. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Who owns water? While Mulholland's famous "thereit is-take it" comment is no longer necessary a cause for celebration,lawsuits and costly remediation have also taken their toll on theDepartment of Water and Power's (DWP) control over the northern water. Several important events have occurred over the history of theaqueduct that might indicate its future. Thus long-term, the DWP is better off using theaquifers and local water sources in conjunction with the water fromnorthern California. Byallowing them appropriation rights, the State expects that these entitieswill provide water distribution to those areas that need water but are notlocated in such a way that riparian rights would be appropriate. (1998, March 3). Although it is not clear that the DWP would have voluntarily soughtadditional sources of water without the pressure to preserve Mono Lake,doing so is definitely in their long-term interests. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Under prior appropriation rights, wateris declared a good that has benefit to the public as a whole, not just toindividuals, and the rights to water can be acquired by demonstration ofbeneficial use as well as by those who are first to use the water. Rediscovering the Golden State: California Geography. The population is not centered inthe areas where the water is found, which makes the riparian approach towater rights unworkable in many cases. Retrieved 7 May 2 7 from: .Selby, W. (n.d.). Mono Lake Committee. Not surprisingly, this has led to controversy and litigationover what constitutes "reasonable" use and whether "first use" occurred bythe riparian owner-or even which of two or more competing appropriationuses can be considered "first" and "reasonable" (Selby, 2 6). Theoretically, California has adopted its hybrid approach to waterrights because it is seeking to provide the greatest amount of benefit tothe population of the state as a whole. Water rights in California Under English Common Law, water rights extended to those who owned theland adjacent to the water. A. The California Doctrine, so named because it was implemented inCalifornia, combines riparian with first appropriation in a hybridapplication of water rights. If the lake isdrained or becomes too saline, it loses value as a source of water forSouthern California. New Mexico State University. ReferenceSDavis, M. ReferencesHurd, B. Conclusion By adopting a combination of riparian and appropriation rights,California has sought to provide the population as a whole with the mostefficient water distribution system. A. While both projects broughtconsiderable water to the Southern California region, both also broughtcontroversy. H. (2 6). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.The Story of the Los Angeles Aqueduct. Unfortunately, these rights were notsufficient to meet the demands of the arid Western states where standingwater or rivers were much more rare than in the Eastern United States(Hurd, 2 3). Conclusion There are no guarantees that the DWP will manage its water resourceswisely, but it is in the long-term interest of Los Angeles to ensure thatits water supply remains high-quality and available-through conservationand exploration-for years to come. The combination andmodification of English Common Law and the Colorado Doctrine has resultedin a uniquely Californian approach to a modern and critical problem. Theterm "first in time, first in right" came from this approach. Prior appropriation rights arose in the West to address theinadequacies of riparian rights. Forexample, the DWP has been limited on the amount of water that it can divertfrom Mono Lake after that lake was seriously depleted (Selby, 2 6). By encouraging appropriation waterrights, the State is also encouraging free market forces to reward thoseentities that are willing to invest the capital in water projects. Because it was ruled that water rights went with land rights,Los Angeles became a significant landowner in Inyo County, for example("The Story of," n.d). These individuals were given the right offirst diversion, or riparian rights. This is made possible through freemarket mechanisms that the hybrid water rights enable. Retrieved 7 May 2 7 from: .Selby, W. As the region attractedimmigration, the need for a stable and secure water supply became moreobvious. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.