HISTORICAL WRITINGS OF WINSTON CHURCHILL.   Term Paper ID:30301 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Presents a historiographical analysis.... More...

25 Pages / 5625 Words 12 sources, 45 Citations, APA Format $100.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Presents a historiographical analysis. Contends Churchill was no historian in spite of his writing talent and vast output of books. Commends his style. Popularity of his writings and lack of critical acclaim. Contends his writings were not scholarly because he imposed his personality and personal experiences in everything he wrote. Paper Introduction: THE HISTORIES OF WINSTON CHURCHILL: A HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS Winston Churchill turned out literally millions of words in his considerable lifetime – he died at ninety in 1965 – and from the beginning, his copy was “gorgeous” (as some editors would put it). He thrilled readers with reportage of his own turn-of-the-century military adventures in India and South Africa. He described, analyzed and speculated upon a host of topics for eager magazine readers in the decades between the two world wars; he completed immense biographies of his own ancestors and other British bigwigs of the past; and he capped his career in the 1950s with a six-volume history of The Second World War and his four-volume A History of the English Speaking Peoples. Churchill’s writings were immensely popular. An impoverished arist Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. Art, philosophy, politicalthought and certainly religion "were by necessity tied closely to thosepeople who uphold the status quo - those who own the means of productionand are called by Marx the exploiters or the ruling class" (Breisach, 1983,p. 29-3 ). by means of itswilling and its hopes, backward through the fullness of its memories"(Droysen, 1893, p. "Objectively, phenomena do not separatethemselves according to space and time" (Droysen, 1893, p. Mostly, though, itwas because history now focused on the story of Rome - and Rome was viewedas eternal. The sad truth was that Alexander was a mereMacedonian, viewed by most Greeks as a virtual barbarian. 27). Before he returned to the governmentafter the outbreak of World War II in 1939, the work was done at Chartwell,his country home outside London. aspects of the Treaty ofVersailles ... Thus, while Herodotus is known as the father of history,nineteenth century German historian Leopold von Ranke is considered thefather of historical science. Surely, he is not among the source-driven positivists of German training and inspiration who have justifiablydominated historiography in all countries for the past century-and-a-half.Likewise, he would not fit among modern-day American historians whosemeticulously annotated texts are nonetheless quite often written inlavishly exciting terms for mass public consumption. The Iliad remained silent on the siege, even on thedestruction of Troy and was followed by a personal adventure story, theOdyssey, as if the fate of the Achaeans did not matter" (Breisach, 1983 7). 259). The Iliad was a sweeping tale of heroic behavior bygods and god-like men who towered over the lives of mere mortals. Cicero himself urged Roman historians to emulate the Greeks byproviding accurate and truthful descriptions of events, as well as analysesof motives, deeds and causes - and to pay attention to their time frame, aswell. a volley of rhetoricalimperatives'" (Manchester, 1983, p. In part, this was due to limits placed upon free speech -though that varied from one emperor's reign to another. References Ashley, M. 6). Herbert Leslie Stewart, for one,took exception to Churchill's view of Russia's aborted participation in thewar. In the jargon of the present,it was always about him. Though the style of his writing, likehis personality, was larger than life, his work was definitely shallow,egocentric and ethnocentric. He felt each form deteriorated when corrupted indifferent ways - monarchy into tyranny because of growing violence andindulgence in excessive luxury; aristocracy into oligarchy because of greedand addiction to power; and democracy into mob rule, again because of greedand also because of a general devaluation of the importance of equality andequal rights. 399). Perhaps this papercan shed some light on the mystery of Winston Churchill, historian. The duke's disruptive and highly counterproductivepolitical machinations had been well documented in the past, and WinstonChurchill was unable to make a convincing case that he had in some way beenwronged. 11-12). A closer look shows his habit of imbuing all he wrote withso much of himself was made to seem grand only by his style. Because laborers were the primary productive force who even soreaped a smaller and smaller share of the rewards from their toil, Marxadvocated the common ownership of all means of production. Even Churchill called his multi-volume account of World War II,published from 1948 to 1953, "'my case ... All that really counted was the story of those heroic types who stillmingled with the gods. Evenearlier, back in the 193 s - ostensibly in his prime - Churchill couldreveal a determined side that bordered on the block-headed. As Alexander'svictories seemed at the time to doom the Greek city-states to dependencyupon Macedonia, his exploits were reported with open hostility."Alexander's grand deeds and short-lived empire ... Churchill: the unruly giant. Benjamin Andrews. 43-4). And he believed this provided a framework,indeed, an absolute moral structure, for understanding ideas and evaluatingthe triumphs and failures of societies and nations down through thecenturies. However, "his was to be a last valiant call for histories whichinstructed people on how they could be better citizens of the Republic andlead more constructive lives" (Breisach, 1983, p. Feeling, imagination, sympathy, and aboveall zest adorn everything he touches with the movement and significance,the sparkle and colour of adventure" (Sencourt, 1941, p. 295). The Dark andMiddle Ages and even the Renaissance would come and go before history wouldcatch up with the new age. could not be located inthe Greek view of the past" (Breisach, p. (1983). Sir Winston Churchill: Gale Research,www.galenet.com: Concise dictionary of British literary biography, 1-16. 213).Sencourt declares that absurd since the postwar embargoes on Germany -coupled with the excessive demands for economic reparations that wereincorporated in the treaty itself - were precisely what created economicchaos in that country and led to the new war that by then was raging acrossall of Europe. Fiction as history or history as fiction?Clio, 395-415. It was a genuine cosmopolitanism that in truth offended many Greeks,though most forgave the author thanks to the unabashed favoritism that hishistory showed their side in his story of the conflict. Indeed, historians were ministers of stateand advisors to kings and presidents. Though Smith still focused mainlyon those pulling the strings, he unhesitatingly exposed the inner workingsat the top and how they would impact on the mass of ordinary people. Stein and Day:New York. He would dictateat a furious pace - hence the need for more than one dictationist - turningout thousands of words every evening. What he saw and presented with all his unfailing linguistic skill tohis readers was Russia's desertion of the cause of the allies" (Stewart,1954, p. The worldaccording to Churchill revolved around Churchill, and if his prose seemedby its very power to sweep us up into his world, a careful reading and astudy of his glaring omissions reveals that in truth we are left out in thecold - with no place in his domain of the vaunted British ruling class.Thus, for all his writing talent and all his vast output, Winston Churchillwas no historian. "Historic history paid little heed to the collectivehuman fate. Carignan, M. Gilbert, M. Droysen's immediate successors built on his ideas. He translated it ... Little, Brown:Boston. Manchester himself, by and largea staunch Churchill admirer, concedes that "the stamp of the man is oneverything he wrote." He even reports a blemish or two on young Winston'stime in South Africa. (1983). Nowadays, the debate rages far more intensely - and in a way over amuch more intense topic: Churchill's place as a historian. Deakin, another of his longtime researchers: I might have given him a memorandum ... Thus, Droysen insisted, history was a creativerecreation of the past told clearly from the standpoint of the present(Breisach, 1983, p. fashioned a soaring, resonant style,sparkling with eighteenth-century wit ... According to Droysen, finding, securing and assessingthe remains of the past, always conceived of as mere documents, lefthistorians utterly aloof from real life and the vagaries of human behavior. Thus, despite the broad sweepand quasi-mythical nature of his approach, Herodotus not only entertainedand inspired, he genuinely informed - by "relating stories which taught theproper moderation, by telling of the many ways of human life, and bydirecting the attention of individuals to the great issues of the past"(Breisach, 1983, p. And while such laterwriters as Plutarch, Suetonius, Tacitus and Cassius Dio would provide deftdescriptions of events and a host of insightful biographies, analyticalprobing was out. Sadly, the answer has to be, only middling. Churchill was criticized by other writers for other gaps or evendistortions in that same set of books. Thus, with so much of his output given so personal a caste, the vastamounts of research were seemingly buried beneath an even vaster pile ofpersonal rhetoric. Events became somehow intertwined with, sprinkled among andconnected to what he had done, whom he had met and where he had been.Thus, even the most ostensibly far-flung of his biographies or historiesbecame his own personal adventure stories. There, the real work would begin at aboutten at night and go until at least three in the morning. Among other things, this radically altered the Greek view of time, whichnow demanded much more continuity and thus became inherently unsuited forheroic history's inevitable discontinuity. 127). The Iliad was meant to be performed, and neither Homer nor any otherwriter, or bard, of his time would have read a tale to aristocraticaudiences that lacked extraordinary heroics - much like Churchill who byhis own admission wrote for the widest possible audience. 8). E. "Churchill's feelingfor the English tongue was sensual, almost erotic" (Manchester, 1983 3 ).And: "Each [of his early works] ... "Conflicts between interest groups,which in the expansionist period could always be defused by expansion, nowrequire more fundamental solutions" (Breisach, 1983, p. While at one pointextolling Churchill's style, at the next he is denouncing him for a lack ofsubstance. But it enlarges ... Ranke wanted fervently to avoid passingjudgment on the past and instead simply to report "'how it actually was'"(Breisach, 1983, p. Indeed, once the empire, from Augustus on, was securely in place,historiography acquired significant new limitations. Discussing Churchill's six-volume The World Crisis, about WorldWar I, Sencourt poses what are perhaps the truly fundamental questions:"Is there with this zest in the technique of [Churchill's] style, aphilosophy of history? America, Turner declared, had relied until thenupon its ever-expanding frontiers to accommodate its increasinglypluralistic makeup and seemingly endless population growth. 278-9). However, Polybius did not exempt Rome from the likelihood of asystemic deterioration. Theculmination of this came perhaps in the 197 s with the publication of PageSmith's extraordinary seven volume People's History of the United States -a landmark work that sought with considerable success to pierce the veil oftraditional ideas often used by the rich and powerful to mask the so-calledreal forces at work in American society. Yet he never wrote to universal critical acclaim. He has also been lionized,so to speak, by a host of independent biographers. In search of Churchill: a historian's journey.John Wiley & Sons: New York. 12). an anthology [of his papers] ...not a history'" (Rose, 1994, p. 282). Specifically,his Marlborough: His Life and Times, a four-volume study of John Churchill,the first Duke of Marlborough, was essentially a failed attempt tovindicate his ancestor. G. His penetrating insight revealed insights I had completely missed (Manchester, 1988, p. Beginning in the 187 s, the world changed so rapidly and in so manyways that history had to change with it or become morbidly irrelevant. It is a fixed world where abenevolent British empire marches forward for the greater good of all"(Rose, 1994, p. Churchill began his book-writing career with The Story of the MalakandField Force, a depiction of a British military expedition on the frontiersof India in the 189 s. Then, quoting Aeschylus: "'Memory, that motherof muses, who shapes all things,' creates for it the forms and thematerials for a world which is in the truest sense the mind's own"(Droysen, 1893, p. Manchester, W. Far from it.Instead, he was roundly criticized by many for imposing to the point ofoppressiveness his own personality and personal experiences upon all hewrote. 216). It was a struggle that began (and continues to this day) with a reportby historian Frederick Jackson Turner to an 1893 meeting of the AmericanHistorical Association. This in turnwould end the formation of social classes and result in a new classlesssociety. The last lion: visions of glory 1874-1932.Little, Brown: Boston. (1994). For onething, it turns out that Churchill's first value in his writing wasinterpretation - specifically, his own. As for Churchill's prose, however, Manchester generally views it withgreat favor: "Churchill's ... [and passagestypically exhale] a false dramatic atmosphere ... Quoting Churchill himself: "'With the design ofthereafter writing this account, I moved to a point on the ridge whichafforded a view of both armies'" (Manchester, 1983, p. 26 ). It was later in that same century thatThucydides penned perhaps the first history which focused on the realisticexploits of real men in a virtually contemporary setting - specifically,his history of the Peloponnesian War. Winston Churchill. Droysen abandoned the transcendent element of Ranke's work and insteadviewed history as encounters by historians - whose own very human liveswere shaped by the past. 18). Theindustrial age had spawned both great wealth and great poverty that wereunprecedented, and new historical theories sprang up to confront them.Karl Marx, for one, evinced the notion that all human endeavor was based oneconomics and an economic interpretation. Beyond that,even by the standards of his day, with all the resources and ingenuity athis command, he failed to make a lasting and significant mark. no hint ofincipient nationalist sentiments ... To deal with this changing story, our past, history now views thepast and present jointly - as inextricably intertwined. By the 192 she had settled into a "team" system, in which he gathered around him atleast two secretaries to take dictation (he had stopped putting actual pento paper by then) and three or four aspiring young student-historians,usually from Oxford or Cambridge. Even so, it was powerfully writtenand its ethnocentric, British-oriented values set the tone for at least theAnglo-American view of the world for a generation. Also in attendance would be theyoung aspirants - researchers and sometime-critics by day, appreciativeaudience by night - sometimes dozing off, even in the midst of themaestro's performance. He thrilledreaders with reportage of his own turn-of-the-century military adventuresin India and South Africa. 26 ). Books more remote from Churchill's personalpresence have serious weaknesses and illuminate his personality more thanthe period of which he is writing" (Biographical, 1991, p. In this thrilling, rather frightening and somewhat unknowable newworld, Winston Churchill is the proverbial dinosaur in the china shop, hisviews as anachronistic as his long-gone and beloved empire. There is no mention of exploitation ... One could labelhim a transition figure in modern historiography, but to say he bridged thegap between history as literature and history as serious research is absurdsince the transition from one to the other was more or less complete beforemost of his work had begun. 2 3).And: "He saw history - and life - as a great renaissance pageant, aglorious, colourful procession of timeless symbols and embodiments ofeternal shining principles" (Rose, 1994, p. 31). entirely separate'" in order to gain a clear understandingof what happened in the aftermath of the war (Sencourt, 1941, p. Thus the whole of his first volume ishistory and good history at that." The tone is not surprising, since among Churchill's many criticsthrough the years was Sir Herbert Read of Oxford, who as early as 1928declared that much of Churchill's work was blatant "'aggrandisation of theself'" (Manchester, 1983, p. Churchill insisted on seeing everything typeset - not just typed, buttypeset - at once. As a writer for certain and as a historian, as well, Winston Churchillhad - and still has - no shortage of admirers. Much has been made of Churchill's ostensibly rigorous approach toresearch, in general, and his fact-checking, in particular. Nevertheless, his fundamentalaccomplishment cannot be discounted. On the otherhand, it's of course unheard of now for soldiers and reporters to be oneand the same, but it evidently was a routine matter then - apparently aclever method the British devised to avoid having real journalists aroundduring possible military embarrassments.) It sold 8,5 copies, substantial for the time, and was followed uptwo years later by a second effort, The River War, Churchill's first "real"book and another about a British military expedition, this time in SouthAfrica. Cicero, but uniquely his own" (Manchester, 1983, p. The educational part -the reason the book was classified as history at all - involved quasi-factual explanations and descriptions of far-off and exotic lands, whichthe people found entertaining and informative, as well. At other times, the underlings would return with their own "write-ups"of documents unearthed, letters discovered, even face-to-face interviewsthat had been conducted with survivors or witnesses to some past event.Often, Churchill would then point out flaws or omissions in theircritiques, usually to their amazement or delight - or so we are told byF.W. shaped ideas and events"(Breisach, 1983, p. throbbing with classical echoesof ... However, it was also loaded down withcohesion that brought order to an increasingly chaotic world. Evenmore effusive was wartime biographer Robert Sencourt, who declared:"Wherever ... (1968). Even so, Herodotus'late fifth century History of the Great Persian War still evoked the broadinfluences of the gods upon the war's outcome - as well as the deeds anddescriptions of heroic figures. 233-4). The Free Press: NewYork. When the changes finally came, they were swiftand beguiling, and would take a then-shoddy art to its golden age and evento the realm of science itself. And from Germany, in particular,came the new methods and approaches that revolutionized historiography onceand for all. Outline of the principles of history (Grundrissder historik). C. However, by the time of Herodotus circa 5 B.C., the Greek world hadchanged immensely from one of mostly rural tribes to bustling city-states"with ... (198 ). Now, knowledgeitself appears in constant flux, always being fundamentally altered,primarily by new scientific discoveries - and as knowledge changes, so doeshistory. By century's end, such views had largely faded from fashion andRanke himself had become an obscure figure outside the exalted innercircles of historiographical discussion. It was a style that Churchill might well have been comfortable with -the absolute certainty of the ideas, the panoramic and grandiose view ofthe past - though there were obvious drawbacks to this approach tohistorical writing. Yet was even thislaborious process enough? To date, the nineteenth century (A.D.) is considered the Golden Age ofhistoriography and historians. Writing so rapidly, and by dictation at that, Churchill wrote andrewrote, putting his precious galleys through four, five, even sixrevisions. 27). (1954). Churchill's biographers make much of his useof whole teams of researchers - apprentice historians, many of whom went onto distinguished careers of their own - who laboriously dug througharchives, interviewed witnesses, verified dates and accounts, etc. And it has changed asmuch all over again in the nearly half-century since he retired.Scientific developments - quantum physics, in particular, with its new viewof swirling and unregulated phenomena - has engendered new views of theworld and new methods of dealing with the past, with history. 313). but it was a transformation that was very special. 261) - remarkable considering thatChurchill was serving as England's chancellor of the exchequer at the verytime The World Crisis was being published. An intellectual revolution was also in full swing, pitting a growth ofindividual autonomy against demands for conformity to law and custom. 29). "Nor is there a word about the desperate plight of the Russian forces... An impoverishedaristocrat by birth, he literally grew rich from the income earned by hisbooks and articles - and his popularity continues at a brisk pace to thisday. As the motion picture director Luis Buñueldeclared, "Memory is all we are," or as Droysen put it: "The finite mindpossesses only the now and the here. At one point, even Ashley declared that his boss's attempts inthis regard were "'like flogging a dead horse'" (Rose, 1983, p. My facts were there, but he had seen it in deeper perspective ... Biographical Essay. Churchill as historian. Rose, N. Yet,even the longest and most elaborate of his works lacks so much as a singlefootnote (or endnote) that might attest to such diligence. This notion of rigorously searching for and checking primary sourcesunder rigid "scientific" safeguards has never dimmed, and the fundamentalsof Ranke's approach soon eclipsed all other methods and became the systemof choice in France, Great Britain and the United States. Sencourt, R. L. Discussions would sometimes go on for hours, even about arcanepoints of grammar and spelling. Reflecting this was the work of theGreek-born historian Polybius, who greatly admired the Roman system and whopostulated in his history that the three major forms of government -monarchy, aristocracy and democracy - came and went on a cyclical basiswithin a given society. 182). Theircourage and their feats were of a type and at a level unattainable bynormal folk of the time who, it must be said, found the larger-than-lifeexploits of these heroes immensely entertaining. Facts, documents,sources were checked and rechecked. Historiography - the study of history in a formal, disciplined way -dates in the Western world to Homer in ancient Greece. As the nineteenth century faded into the twentieth and as the violenceof a world war merged into the brutality of the Great Depression,historiography became increasingly concerned with the destiny of the massesof ordinary working people. Stewart, H. Or so itseemed. Now he would walk up and down dictating. Likewise, theywould not recite at public gatherings a tale that reminded the common folkof their own daily struggles to earn a living and survive. [Churchill's] glance rests, men come to life and at hisapproach live more abundantly. "The new professional historians assumed that the past was a realityindependent of their own consciousness, and that this condition made theirtask simply the business of reporting their findings from research inprimary documents" (Carignan, 2 , p. "Churchill took immense pains overcollecting his material" (Ashley, 1968, p. Instead, itis only "our apprehension that thus distinguishes them." At a glance,Churchill's approach fits right in with Droysen's thinking - but onlysuperficially. Again, aswe'll see shortly, his substance never really rose above his own all-too-human soul. (1988). 26 ). So, the secretaries would swiftly type up theirshorthand transcripts and deliver them to the printer first thing in themorning - and the galleys would be returned to Chartwell that afternoon.This was a fantastically expensive way to edit, and faced with increasinglyreluctant publishers, Churchill eventually hired his own printer andevidently bore that cost on his own. Trans. 57). Here, Churchill would also have feltat home - for though he imbued all he touched upon with heroics, hissubject of choice was clearly real men involved in real conflicts.Nevertheless, it is Herodotus who remains known to most as the father ofhistory, for, as he put it himself, preserving "'the memory of the past byputting on record the astonishing achievements both of our own and of theAsiatic peoples'" (Breisach, 1983, p. Churchill's writings were immensely popular. Sencourt is also not alone in noting Churchill's disdain foreconomics. Nineteen hundred years after Cicero's callfor "veritas" in historical reportage, Ranke at long last institutionalizedthe concept and spread its use throughout the western world. Sir Winston Churchill as writer and speaker.Sidgwick and Jackson: London.. Long the domain of monarchs, presidents andother leaders, the people's worries and concerns and very destiny began topreoccupy historians of the Western world, particularly those in the UnitedStates, where so-called new history took hold. Read goes on to state that Churchill's vaunted eloquence is "'falsebecause it is artificial ... As for his volumesabout the English speaking peoples, Churchill called the key selections forthe chronicle "'personal - and at times arbitrary.'" And in putting ittogether he stressed to his research staff "the importance of historicalmyth in a nation's collective consciousness" (Rose, 1994, p. I. Wars and economicdisruptions aside, looming large was the growing disappointment over theresults of modern science. And elsewhere: "As a historian he[Churchill] is at his best in describing events with which he had anintimate connection ... urban center[s] ... Urging a new agenda for historians, Diltheydeclared, "'We explain nature, we understand the human world, which is theworld of the mind'" (Breisach, 1983, p. In the famous phrase of Marx and Frederich Engels, "'Fromeveryone according to his ability, to everyone according to his need'"(Breisach, 1983, p. At best, he was a historical stylist - and that isn'tmuch considering all the power he held, all the work he did and all that'sbeen written and said about him. 233). By the days of Cicero and the Caesars, circa 5 B.C., the Romanhistorian Sallust had written a scathing account, declaring that extremewealth and luxury, along with incessant infighting and even outrightwarring among political leaders, were sapping Rome of its integrity andstrength. four or five hours before. "They do notquestion Britain's imperial mission, or touch upon the squalid side ofimperial rule. "Rarely [it seems] does he touch [in any of his books] upon ...economic ... Like virtually everything he wrote,this early effort hardly suffered from lack of tonnage, in final formweighing in at two lengthy volumes. a Divine will ... [were] blunted, and he lacked academic detachment.Instead, when the occasion demanded it, he employed his artist's eye,touching up the picture now and then as it suited him" (Rose, 1994, p.26 ). The Romans in the days of the republic, however, had devised whatPolybius viewed as a combination of all three, with the two elected consulsrepresenting monarchy for their simultaneous one-year terms, the Senate andits lifetime terms representing aristocracy and the popular assembliesdemocracy. 294). toexploit by research particular points'" (Gilbert, 1994, p. 259). His instincts are true and just: but he never directed the searchlight of his genius on to the details of the trouble. 3 ). The focus and primaryconcern of these historians since the early 19 s has been to create a newpeople-oriented history - "not only to expose the divergence betweendemocratic ideals and the realities in American life but to remedy it"(Breisach, 1983, p. Though nonjudgmental to a fault, Ranke held fast to certain ideas -that "an intuitive cognition ... Droysen, J. Sencourt answers with a resounding no and declares his anger atcertain key omissions in Churchill's work. Indeed, mostAmerican historians prior to World War I received their advanced trained atGerman universities. In earliertimes, the past was a finished place, complete and unalterable - much asthe body of human knowledge was finite and unchanging. And with thetraditional view of a cohesive reality all but shattered, historiographybecame increasingly uncertain, as well. (1893). Inaddition, the ancients began to explore and colonize the Middle East andthe coasts of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Historiography: ancient, medieval, & modern.University of Chicago Press: Chicago. Charles Scribner's Sons:New York. (1991). LikeChurchill a nonagenarian and prolific writer, by the time of his death in1886 at age ninety-one Ranke had filled fifty-four volumes with hishistorical and political writings. Had he done so, he must have confessed even more openly than he has done that the last two years of the war had been a failure (Sencourt, 1941, p. Indeed, a century later, Rome was anempire and the Republic was gone for good in all but outward appearances. By the second century B.C., Greek power had faded and Rome was the newmaster of the Mediterranean world. Each is cast in the classic mould" (Sencourt, 1941, p. Now, however,the frontiers were closed and the nation would have to find new ways ofdealing with its growth and diversity. For another, though he appeared tobe a devoted gatherer of facts and information, as we shall see later thosefacts often took second place to his own intense rhetoric. He described, analyzed and speculated upon ahost of topics for eager magazine readers in the decades between the twoworld wars; he completed immense biographies of his own ancestors and otherBritish bigwigs of the past; and he capped his career in the 195 s with asix-volume history of The Second World War and his four-volume A History ofthe English Speaking Peoples. 281), and thus "with the actions ofhuman beings and their results." Historians who merely observed, countedand measured were doomed to fail because "they could not grasp the complexprocess in which intentions, purposes, or ends shaped human actions"(Breisach, 1983, p. Only the style saved him, for what in most hands wouldbe unabashed verbiage was from Churchill finely-chiseled prose. The present, he said, was "'filled with pasts and pregnantwith the future'" (Breisach, 1983, p. "AlthoughChurchill went through an historian's motions, checking private papers,collating secondary sources, conducting interviews whenever possible, hiscritical faculties ... Churchill wartime contemporary Sencourt, though notalone in this category, is perhaps most blatant in the almost eerieschizophrenia with which he views his subject. is a masterpiece in style andordonnance. Instead of revealing the "true order ofthings," as once promised, the more scientists researched and dug, the moremysterious and less comprehensible reality became. THE HISTORIES OF WINSTON CHURCHILL: A HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS Winston Churchill turned out literally millions of words in hisconsiderable lifetime - he died at ninety in 1965 - and from the beginning,his copy was "gorgeous" (as some editors would put it). (2 ). Churchill: speaker of the century. On a somewhat more moderate and mainstream note (at least in theWest), the break from or at least modification of Ranke's approach was ledby another German historian, Johann Gustav Droysen, who found key flaws inRanke's thinking. 212)? The last lion: alone 1932-194 . Basically, it becamea branch of literature again - there to unite, inspire and entertain.Instruction and insight were inevitable, of course, but mainly to serve thebroader purpose, and certainly not to incite or provoke. In other words, "Romans were simply unable to concede that soeminent a state could be subject to the same cyclical patterns as previousempires" (Breisach, 1983, p. 211). Most prominentamong them was Wilhelm Dilthey who called upon history to view life as adynamic whole. Is there a piercing and prophetic gift to pointdirection in a distracted age" (Sencourt, 1941, p. The war and his job as Prime Minister naturally brought his outsidewriting to a halt, and when he resumed in the late 194 s it was with mixedresults. His epic The Iliadpaints a sweeping portrait of that world in dramatic and even mythicalterms, and though it was the first work of its type that we know of, it wasin a sense the last. Part of the book was written later in India and part afterChurchill returned home to England. Indeed, in a kindof quantum history, if you will, the past exists in the reality of thepresent. Whole pages of ideas that by light of day failed to hold upwere scrapped, and he would start the section over. marked by a keen and creative tension and ...[a] zeal for exploration and rational organization" (Breisach, 1983, p. (1994). In particular, he is incensedby Churchill's call to keep "'the economic ... 138). the images are stale ... Faber and Faber: London. Humes, J. (While such compilations are routine now, they wereunheard of at the time, so Churchill's effort was pioneering. Published in 1897, it was actually a "paste-up" orcompilation of his wartime dispatches from when he had servedsimultaneously as a soldier-correspondent for the British army and variousLondon dailies. Historiography would adhere to this basic pattern for many centuries.Although approaches naturally varied through the years, history in a sensereturned to the roots devised by Homer and Herodotus. Historiography had changed immensely in the decades before Churchillbegan putting pen to paper, or voice to steno pad. Certainly, Churchill would have been alarmed by themetaphysical aspect of Droysen's approach; after all, he would havethought, this was his mind and these were his ideas being applied to hishistory. Another critic, Lord Balfour, called World Crisis, "'anautobiography disguised as a history of the universe'" (Humes, 198 , p.15 ). 315). New York: Howard Fertig, 1967. However, one more recent critic dismisses outright Churchill's earlyworks from South Africa and India as mere adventure stories. Manchester, W. Evidentlyfinding this a tad offensive, implying that he - and we - should bewondering what Churchill was supposed to be doing at the time a big battlewas raging, Manchester tells us, "Here are two mighty forces preparing todo battle, and here is a lowly subaltern riding off to get the bestperspective." Evidently groping for an explanation of such malfeasance(however petty), Manchester goes on to quote a fellow war correspondent atthe South African front that Churchill had the "assurance, arrogance andbravado" common among the British ruling classes - "'the conviction that hebelongs to the best group in the world'" (Manchester, 1983, p. 18). His various teams ofresearchers, and even his often-beleaguered secretaries, continue for themost to shower him with praise and adulation. The big question today is, how would Churchill have fared withinRanke's system? Again, one must wonder how he decided to excludeentirely even a hint of the annotations from which serious historical workscan be verified by any reader - or ignored by all others. With notable defensiveness, MauriceAshley, one of Churchill's long-standing team members, tells us: "It wasnot until he reached the first chapter of the second volume that Churchillintroduced himself upon the stage. Discussing what might be called his selective approach to research ina letter to Ashley, Churchill declared, "'The first thing to do is to seethe old tale in a new light, and in its true proportions, and then ... 9). In terms of suchgoals, the Greeks were, in effect, unmasked in the mid-fourth century whenAlexander the Great's triumphant exploits were given short shrift in thehistories of the day. Breisach, E. 66-7). Striding resolutely into thisscene of growing confusion and degeneration was the writer and politicianWinston Leonard Spencer Churchill. In any case, Churchill and hisacolytes would then examine the galleys meticulously, and to his credit,Churchill welcomed their comments and criticisms, often incorporating theirsuggestions - though always imbuing all with his own eminently distinctivestyle. Thus, all Greekhistoriography was suddenly adrift - in search of a meaningful theme forits own history. Indeed, he placed the researchseminar at the center of education for aspiring historians and sent them indroves digging through archives for documentation of countless events inthe recent or distant past. (1941). affairs" (Rose, 1994, p. Meanwhile, by the mid-Twentieth Century, other forces were againdramatically reshaping the course of historiography. So, does this place him among the pre-nineteenth century romanticswhen history was hardly more than myth-making and entertainment, serving asvital work of national inspiration? 29). In fact, he said that while the system workedwonderfully at the time, he foresaw - correctly - that all three would failat once with an extreme result. Sencourt goes further, however,declaring that aside from fundamental economics, Churchill also ignored theobvious ethnic and racial tensions that flared in Germany and across Europein the years between the world wars: Mr. Churchill, who lifted many veils, left this untouched, though behind it were all the combined dangers of political and economic confusion and misery left by the Treat of Versailles. Thus, history wasstill primarily an instrument of national unity and pride - to be sure, apervasive goal of Churchill's own historical writing which generallyextolled the British Empire and the British way of life. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.