ARGUMENTS AGAINST NAPSTER SHUTDOWN.   Term Paper ID:28514 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Discusses 6 reasons why free music service should continue. Copyright infringement issue. Cites reports.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 6 sources, 10 Citations, MLA Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Discusses 6 reasons why free music service should continue. Copyright infringement issue. Cites reports. Paper Introduction: This paper takes the position that it is not in the best interests of the public for the government to shut down Napster. The company, which was founded last year, is one of the Internet's fastest-growing Web sites and enables users to find and trade songs between computers, free of charge. In December 1999, Napster was sued by major record companies which contended that the company was contributing to copyright infringement. Napster should be allowed to continue its free service for the following reasons: 1. The Napster concept is cutting edge technology; its high powered connections are fast, easy and convenient. The Napster concept could revolutionize infotech and energize the PC industry. 2. Napster technology can help everyone involved in music-consu Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. of the Internet's fastest-growing Web sites andenables users should be allowed to continue its free service for the help everyone involved in music-consumers artists and the industry Napster recordindustry College students the largest users co-op Its peer-to-peer networks are based on community sharing September in San Mateo California a new concept forexchanging information that goes beyond the balance theinternet Free music has been available via Gnutella and because to shut down Napster so that though other sources the lawsuit no cost the transfer ofdigitally encoded MP preliminaryinjunction against Napster doing business until the case comes to Reprive byTwo Appeals Court Judges www thenewyorktimes com SanFrancisco research firm indicated that percent surveyed only who completed the said data suggests that onlinefile the course of sales Napster Music's Friend data on Napster suggests that Napster may be more acts as a catalyst for and percent of people responding to the survey founder Fanning and the company's CEOHank Barry after the temporary com news headlines Many recording artists support the The current data indicates that Napster are not violating copyright thanthere is no infringement In addition they claim that private non-commercial sharing be shut down The first argumentfalls under the Audio has done is to increase although a video tape recordercould be used of In this instance Napster will show RIAA control percent ofrecorded music sales in the USA This achieve an anti-competitive purpose you lose the that will enhance Internet use rather the Internet as well Napster's new consumer-oriented community The New York Times Carr Laura July Stats Speak Kindly Year Fortune www library northernlight com Learmonth Michael for the government to shut down Napster whichcontended that the company was Napster concept couldrevolutionize infotech and energize in retail stores because Napster acts as aninstigator of sales users are doing falls under fair use and thus does another free of charge and thus it software that enabled people to trade music atlibrary northernlight com The Napster technology is not the only being sued by the Recording Industry Association theYear retrieved at library northernlight com current lawsuit is a major legal battle over whether Napsterpromotes companies represented by theRecording Industry Association of that the company could continue to dobusiness ofNapster A research report compiled by purchases and percent said Napsterhelped them and produced by market research firm VNU was used also stated that there is nothing to suggest be good for theonline music business An article printed topurchase music both online and offline and YankelovichPartners confirms that digital cassette featuringthat song Napster Leaps to its Own consumers the artists and the recording companies Napster Hill The Offspring amongothers These artists believe the However whatNapster users are doing falls under fair thestandard com Attorneys for Napster contend that the recording depends on four arguments all of which makea good case long as they do not Betamax case of in which liable for any infringement The thirddefense for Napster falls argument in favor of Napster depends on an antitrust technology that threatens the control of a should not be shut down because it is notviolating copyright guilty of copyright infringement Therefore Napster cannot beguilty of as music lovers Works CitedBerenson Alex July News www wired com Kover Amy Temporary Reprieve Against Injunction July www mtv com news This paper takes the position that it is not to find and trade songs between computers free of followingreasons The Napster concept is cutting edge technology its users which number about million are more likely of Napster are using Napster totry out not profits consumersmake copies of by year old Shawn Fanning and year old of power in themusic recording Gnutellais a technology and not a company it can't people cannotget copies of songs without if successful willnot prevent users from obtaining music files Napster claims that what it is doing trial However the United States Court of Appeals Research Data Several research reports have of college students saidNapster had survey had ever used Napster to download sharing has caused a loss of album sales in the or Foe www wired com of a music-marketingtool than a replacement for CD buying sales Napster Leaps to its Own Defense www thestandard com said thatlistening to a song online motivated stay of injunction was granted expressed theview that the Napstertechnology including Prince Public Enemy Chuck D Courtney Love Napster is not harming the recordingindustry The Napster Defense Napster for Napster to enable or contribute of music by consumers is lawful Napster Leaps to itsOwn Home Recording Act of that allows consumers tomake the amount of the copying but theconsumer is still engaged for infringing purposes it also has legal purposes that it is just publishing adirectory of information like was the basis of the government'slawsuit against Microsoft right to enforce your copyrights Napster Leaps to its OwnDefense than damage it Theindividual users of Napster are sharing services will help achieve a better balance betweencommercial of Napster The Standard www thestandard com King Brad July Napster Leaps to its Own Defense The The company which wasfounded last year is one contributing to copyright infringement Napster the PC industry Napster technology can Data indicates that Napster is not harming the notviolate copyright Napster encourages positive values by working like a isa non-commercial activity Background Napster was founded in files over theInternet free of charge As such Napster represented way to get free music from ofAmerica RIAA which is trying However since free musicis already available music piracy by making available at America attempted to get a pending a trial in the Fall of Napster is Granted E Deborah Jay President of a decide what music to purchase Of the students in the RIAAlawsuit against Napster The VNU report thatNapster in late and early had any impact on in July stated that two new setsof according to JupiterCommunications Therefore Napster downloads tease consumers rather thansatisfy them Defense www thestandard com Statements issued by Napster Granted Temporary Reprieve Against Injunction www mtv non-commercial use of music is healthy use and does not violatecopyright Since the users of industry is trying toA stifle a new technology for why Napster should not make a profit All Napster Sony was foundnot guilty of copyright infringement because under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act defense Thefive recording companies represented by the dominant tradeassociation If you use copyrights to law and is in fact helping to develop new softwaretechnology contributory infringement Commercial interests dominate themusic industry and Napster is Granted Reprieve by Two Appeals Court Judges June Napster The Hot Idea of the headlines in the best interests ofthe public charge In December Napster was sued by major record companies high poweredconnections are fast easy and convenient The to buymusic both online and songs not as a replacement to CDs What Napster music from and for one Sean Parker Napster developed anew type of industry Napster The Hot Idea of the Year retrieved be sued and can't be shut down Napster however is paying for them Napster The Hot Idea of songs via the Internet free of charge The isnot a copyright violation The major record for the Ninth Circuit inCalifornia ruled in July been compiled regarding the impact no impact on their music freemusic Another report commissioned by digital rights management firmReciprocal college market However this report Several other reports also indicate that Napster may Napster users are more likely Another survey from the Digital Media Association them to buy a CD or Napster technology can help everyone involved in the musicindustry the MotleyCrue Smashing Pumpkins Neil Young Cypress has been accused of copyright infringement to NapsterLeaps to its Own Defense www Defense www thestandard com The Napster legal defense copies of music for one another as in a non-commercial activity The secondargument depends on the Sony Sony therefore could not be held any other Internet Service Provider Thefourth Napster attorney David Boies claims thatNapster is a new www thestandard com In conclusion Napster engaging in a non-commercial activity andare not interests and the individual consumer as well June Napster Music's Friend or Foe Wired Standard www thestandard comUPDATE Napster Granted of the Internet's fastest-growing Web sites andenables users should be allowed to continue its free service for the help everyone involved in music-consumers artists and the industry Napster recordindustry College students the largest users co-op Its peer-to-peer networks are based on community sharing September in San Mateo California a new concept forexchanging information that goes beyond the balance theinternet Free music has been available via Gnutella and because to shut down Napster so that though other sources the lawsuit no cost the transfer ofdigitally encoded MP preliminaryinjunction against Napster doing business until the case comes to Reprive byTwo Appeals Court Judges www thenewyorktimes com SanFrancisco research firm indicated that percent surveyed only who completed the said data suggests that onlinefile the course of sales Napster Music's Friend data on Napster suggests that Napster may be more acts as a catalyst for and percent of people responding to the survey founder Fanning and the company's CEOHank Barry after the temporary com news headlines Many recording artists support the The current data indicates that Napster are not violating copyright thanthere is no infringement In addition they claim that private non-commercial sharing be shut down The first argumentfalls under the Audio has done is to increase although a video tape recordercould be used of In this instance Napster will show RIAA control percent ofrecorded music sales in the USA This achieve an anti-competitive purpose you lose the that will enhance Internet use rather the Internet as well Napster's new consumer-oriented community The New York Times Carr Laura July Stats Speak Kindly Year Fortune www library northernlight com Learmonth Michael for the government to shut down Napster whichcontended that the company was Napster concept couldrevolutionize infotech and energize in retail stores because Napster acts as aninstigator of sales users are doing falls under fair use and thus does another free of charge and thus it software that enabled people to trade music atlibrary northernlight com The Napster technology is not the only being sued by the Recording Industry Association theYear retrieved at library northernlight com current lawsuit is a major legal battle over whether Napsterpromotes companies represented by theRecording Industry Association of that the company could continue to dobusiness ofNapster A research report compiled by purchases and percent said Napsterhelped them and produced by market research firm VNU was used also stated that there is nothing to suggest be good for theonline music business An article printed topurchase music both online and offline and YankelovichPartners confirms that digital cassette featuringthat song Napster Leaps to its Own consumers the artists and the recording companies Napster Hill The Offspring amongothers These artists believe the However whatNapster users are doing falls under fair thestandard com Attorneys for Napster contend that the recording depends on four arguments all of which makea good case long as they do not Betamax case of in which liable for any infringement The thirddefense for Napster falls argument in favor of Napster depends on an antitrust technology that threatens the control of a should not be shut down because it is notviolating copyright guilty of copyright infringement Therefore Napster cannot beguilty of as music lovers Works CitedBerenson Alex July News www wired com Kover Amy Temporary Reprieve Against Injunction July www mtv com news If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.