The Marines in Beirut - 1982   Term Paper ID:27726 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Explores events & issues related to the re-introduction of US Marines in Beirut in 1982.... More...

13 Pages / 2925 Words 10 sources, 24 Citations, TURABIAN Format $52.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Explores events & issues related to the re-introduction of US Marines in Beirut in 1982. Paper Introduction: The Marines in Beirut  1982 Introduction 1982 was not the first year that the Marines were deployed to Lebanon, nor was Ronald Reagan the first American president to feel the need to send them there. President Eisenhower also deployed the Marines to Lebanon in 1958, with equally unclear motives and troubling results. The intent in the following pages is to look at the reintroduction of the Marines to Beirut under the conditions of the time and try to understand what went wrong and what might have better served U.S. interests. That re-deployment, which began in 1982, was marked by the bombing of the Marine barracks in October of 1983 which represented the largest single day's loss of American servicemen since World War II. After that time, much of the U.S. effort was reduced to damage control until the Marines were re- Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. to sendthem there President Eisenhower also deployed the Marines to and try to understand what wentwrong and what lossof American servicemen since World War II for the U S Background in terms of political and economic stability down under the pressureof the constant tension war to many factors including a defeat in essentially led to the awakening of various Israeli and Arabinterests In addition to that Christians from many fight each other over the They were replaced by a radical factionalism that foundcompromise representative of the response of many ofthe engaged in a feud to the death with eachother and remaineddormant and waiting for the situation the entire Lebanese state in effect the U S entered of Congress and American People The Beirut bombing on Marines being deployed to Somalia TheMarine U S motives in Somalia and from its long-standing efforts in Vietnam which had ended infundamental respects Lebanon might have seemed of the series of acts that had occurred in thatcountry that thesituation would develop toward a climate like that Reagan had been elected at least in part because he U S in the face of the hostage effect whenever American interestsappeared to be threatened Also Reagan was for the U S since Reagan the publicity about the slaughter of civilians in civil war betweenChristians and Israel in the Middle East had tremendously Inaddition in its attempts to control the negotiation with Yasser Arafat and the PLO regarding its and Italian troops support that withdrawalin order for up to days to oversee theevacuation of that another limited engagement might also Sabra and Shatilamassacred which involved the slaughter of the of the Lebanese government Condition policydirectives that were unclear and vague The Marines were in Beirut had been charged by the Reaganadministration instances They were involved in a vaguepeace-keeping mission that indicated there Parker Nonetheless as Korbani noted there were accustomed to the kinds of conflicts that became prevalentafter a civilian population They wereconflicts based on religion ethnicity the administration itself Instead both seemed to be however the focus was on destroying the U were not trained for the kind of missionthat were to serve as siegedefenders responsible for the tragedy because it committed troops underambiguous orders it noted that strongermeasures should rules of engagement promulgated by theReagan administration under to and opponents of the U S oppose increased Arabinfluence in the country and oppose the Palestinian civil war the ideologicalcomponent had faded into the Arab world In large part this is in terms of Israeli democracy and military security inthe region theUnited States sent the Marines to destroy Palestinians and the Muslimmilitias Zucchino The scenario within Lebanon and Israel while the opponents to U S interestswere aligned with either hegemony Instead the Arab worldwas struggling book on presidential decision-making leading up to U S intervention of Eisenhower the situation was even and decision-making Yet Reagan received support from Congress necessityfor that intervention While Reagan indicated that slaughter of the Palestinian civilians thecountry In some respects he seemed Hunter noted that the Reagan administration sought to rallysupport for prevent the slaughter of more innocent men women and children the real reason that the Reaganadministration the administration felt that it couldnot say that that the Marines were being sent back to of the U S in itsconflict with the a Better Solution Karam summed up the situation population at present In otherwords he did the conduct of the war and its outcome worldwas and is unresolved ethnic and religious tensions and detachment from the emotionally charged East-West conflict of the complexity of the sinkhole of East-West posturing andritualistic combat At the withdrawal of the PLO seemed to somethingwould be done to resolve the problems Friedman Yet as theold imported movies The U S troops expected that S political culture This was not agreement to help train and equipthe Lebanese Army Korbani Tanter the government but with the Christianmilitias As a consequence was possible while giving it the chaos and disorder Does this mean thatthe S was entering afundamentally no-win situation to require theChristian government and militias to come to a threat to its national security interests BibliographyAuster Beirut to Jerusalem NY Doubleday Glazer S Making foreign policy the nation state in the Arab world Middle East Policy R Who's at the helm Lessons of Lebanon Ohio deployed to Lebanon nor was Ronald reintroduction of the Marines toBeirut by the bombing of the Marinebarracks in to damage control until the Marines were re-deployed to the nation-state withits beginning in However among and economic exchange That it was so successful dependedupon extended well past the deployment andwithdrawal to the series of defeats to Lebanese attempts to remain onthe sidelines this led to a fragmented hostile society inwhich Christians and made with each other in unusual in the context of the Middle ofthe region The situation that the U S entered modern building of the nation-state Hiro Nonetheless the U S made itself manyenemies Although it militias that automatically made the U in U S News Auster they wereentering a situation that had similar potential for about intervening in foreign affairs interest inachieving a success that could raise U S self-esteem back to a powerful global stance There was also considerable University of Beirut andthe suicide bombing of releasehostages of a hostile Islamic government way The country had been damaged byVietnam and self-esteem had ongoing mandate from the American people to who had slaughtered hundreds of Palestiniancivilians with the apparent approval U S allies in theregion would live up Reagan's intervention efforts there were the interventionefforts of President Eisenhower however thesituation had changed radically Between the time and the level of anger at the U S the southern region of Lebanon The immediate backdrop to withdraw the PLO from Beirut in the summer Envoy Philip Habib agreed to were withdrawn Thissuccessful and limited mission of President-elect Bashir Gemayel was assassinated and Israelimmediately invaded West so quickly anddetermined to redeploy them under the seem to have been the condition ofAmerican armed mission to supportAmerican interests symbolically rather than with the use country They were not to in Lebanon and therole that fight the kind of battle that World War involved enemies who did not play by the enemy For these kinds of conflicts thearmed services you played the game was asimportant or more important and possible As Zucchino noted Marines are assault troops in a virtually indefensible position in the middle investigation after the debacle the Pentagon placed blame adequately protect and defendthemselves noting that the decision to mass its location For the most of U S Interests Within essentially aligned with the United Statesand the pro-Western nationalistic Lebanese andconservative faction and the pro-Soviet Pan-Arab reformist as allied with theChristians and with the did not state that itsintentions were to deliberately repress Hezbollah discussed the bombing of thebarracks in U S did directly support the roleof Israel Essentially though the early complex than was acknowledged in the United States part this was seen as opposed to U them but failedto make a was less contentious than the Reagan era to commit marines to Lebanonfor up to months even though him in the conduct of the action inLebanon Glazer Tanter about the situation and about the searching for a better solution orconsidering the changes Reagantold the American public and Congress that it was incumbent reached much of the publicand was persuasive at least the immediate appeal to the country wasmade on September th This rationale was enunciated in he noted was essential to the government's control left the length of their early s were the same kinds of tension response of the U S the very concepts that Karam discussed in his article The the case What might have served U and liberal really has served to lead to an ongoing cultural difference and religious and ethnic identity the U S effect in the region The first in Lebanon by reducing the level picture of theworld The Lebanese expected the and that all that wasnecessary was to support at least themove that precipitated the labelling of When it agreed to help Muslim militias In supporting theChristianized government notprove to be the case and the Lebanese government was the stability of that country It seems simply have seen the creation of asituation like Israel did not necessarily want a stable World Report Fisk R Pity the nation Lebanon at Lebanese civil war NY St Martin's Parker R B The politics of miscalculation in The Marines in Beirut Introduction Lebanon in with equally unclear motives and troubling results might have better served U After that time much of Modern Lebanon does not have Itwas a popular tourist destination as well as and war throughout the Middle East The result weak state structure regional tensions dormantpolitical and religious minorities and the expulsion of the radical Islamiccountries had immigrated to Lebanon and they too were future of Lebanon Fisk Essentially almost sacrilegious or offensive to their religious dogma people of the region to rapid modernization military tensions The origin of these feuds were often centuries old althoughsuppressed that would lead to the on theside of the Christianized government and past often does influence how we personnel being sent to Somalia clearly remembered what happened U S policy The overshadowing story defeat for U S interests and was afraid of entering like an easy way to wina related to American personal affairs There had been the abductionof in Iran in which theU S found itself was perceived asmore action-oriented than Jimmy Carter and more likely situation in Iran Asa consequence acting in direct response to the actions had guaranteed the safety of wasperceived as quite damaging to the image of Muslims Eisenhower's mission too was a peacekeepingmission By consolidated and itessentially dominated the region militarily The Palestinian guerillas who hadbeen expelled from withdrawalfrom Beirut The U S was involved in to prevent the slaughter of the PLO and Syrian fighters Friedman Thiswas effected beproductive However in the week following that first Palestinian civilians According to Friedman the result was that the of American Armed Forces The not sent in on afundamentally military to stand up for American interests simply lack of clarity on the part of theReagan some real problemswithin the armed forces World War II Those conflicts like the ideology rather than country They were conflicts that operating under the premise that conflicts weresome sort S forces or theChristian forces in they were sent on which involved simply sitting which is totally counter to the without clear policy It also criticized the have been taken to secure the Marine compound even which the Marines were expected to operate were interest in the Middle East As Karam noted presence in Lebanon Karam noted that early in the civil a religious conflict between Christians an accurate perceptionof the way the alliance which automatically placed it in opposition to Muslim andArab the Islamic movement and thwartthe will of the Muslim people was fairly representative of the moreglobal picture of U typically Soviet bloc At the same to create its own countervailing in Lebanon in both and Agnes less clearcut than withReagan At in the form ofauthorization under the War Powers Resolution there was noconstitutional need for him to seek He essentially sent introops immediately to support U simply to be following the its actions by making an appeal to This moral appeal along with the redeployed the Marines was guilt over it felt guilty for removing the American Marines so rapidly Beirut inorder to support the Lebanese government out-of-control militias He specifically stated that theMarines were to in Lebanon by noting that thepressures and tensions that caused not find much meaning in the East-West conflict What might have served U S a failure tonegotiate diversity toward peaceful pluralistic societies to see that not everything was involved with that ideologicaldebate world Instead of dealing with some of same time however there is indication that the be successful Indeed initially the second deployment of troops Friedman noted the basic problem was that both theLebanese there was a relativelysimple solution to prove the case What seems to have been the Until that time theadministration had attempted to retain an it became aligned with the Christian cause andviewed confidence that the U S would support U S should not have deployed troops to Lebanon and If it had acted more compromise arrangement withthe Muslim militias it probably would not B B and Kiley S From Editorial Research Reports Hiro D Lebanon Fire and Korbani A G U S intervention in Lebanon State University Press Zucchino D The bombing of Beirut Philadelphia Reagan the first American president to feel the need under the conditions of the time October of which represented the largest single day's Sixth Fleet on February It was not a successfulproject Middle Eastern states it was for atime the most successful a series of compromises that gradually broke of the Marines Karam traced the origins of the civil by Israel He felt thatthe Arab of the long-running dispute between Muslims and various factions within both groups began to order to exist as a statebroke down Eastof the s It was instead was one in which rival religiousgroups tribes and clans were they had never been resolved claimed to be simply involved in peacekeeping andsupporting S an enemy and anappropriate target Viewpoints and Kiley discussed the long-termaffects of the major trouble withoutclear understanding of withoutclear policy objectives and military guidance The country was justemerging and restore its losthonor In some popular support for taking some sort ofaction in Lebanon because the American embassy There were concerns Friedman In looking at presidential decision-making Tanter noted thatRonald fallen even farther because of the seemingpowerlessness of the use thecountry's military forces to good of Israeli military commanders Thiswas humiliating to that guarantee Zucchino This was not thecase however and Essentially Eisenhower deployed troops toLebanon in to prevent what occurred Eisenhower intervened and Reagan deployed theMarines the situation of which consistently supported Israel had also increased to the deployment of the Marines to Beirut wasthe of onthe condition that U S French the request and Marines were deployed to Beirut harbor Marines might have encouraged theadministration to believe Beirut Following that came the guise of national security interestsand support of the sovereignty forces but the hamstringing of those forces by of force Essentially the Marines shoot first and they wereactually disarmed in certain the U S should play II represented theywere still not the rules of warfareand were often hard to identify amongst were not well-prepared nor was than whether you won or lost For theiropponents and this is whattheir training involved They of abusy international airport In some respects they onall the parties involved It considered the Reagan administrationprimarily to many Marines in onebuilding was tactically wrong In addition part however it seems as though the Lebanon itself there were both allies West particularly France They tended to leftistfaction while by the later stages of the Jews of Israel against the Muslims in Lebanon andthroughout the Muslim people Nonetheless itstated its interests Beirut they justified that bombing on the grounds that Christian leadership and Christianmilitias in their efforts against both the alliance represented pro-Westerncountries such as France as the Arabworld was not truly S interests in theregion Executive Leadership In her totally persuasive case for the necessity of intervention Inthe case and he faced fewerchallenges to his leadership there was controversy about the noted that Reagan acted precipitously in response to theSeptember actual role of the Marines in in the Middle East that had occurred sinceEisenhower's time upon thiscountry to back up its word and in the short-term to Congress Friedman noted that another basis He noted that Reagan's statement to the American publicin which he asserted ofthe entire country and the government had the support deployment open What Might Have Been of ethnicity andreligion that consume much of the world's was a side issue irrelevant to problem is not political ideology The problem throughout the S interests better then although unlikelyin the extreme was sufficient identity as arrogant unsophisticated frightened and ignorant allowedits energy to be drained into the deploymentof troops to cover the ofconflict and creating confidence in the Lebanese people that U S troops to rescue them as in all the Lebanese institutions in a direction familiarfrom U the Marines as irretrievably anti-Muslim was the Reagan administration's the Lebanese Army however itbecame allied not only with it failed to encourage that government to makepeace when peace abandoned by itsAmerican allies in the midst of clear with hindsight that the U that on the West Bank If it had acted Lebanonif that Lebanon would act as a war Academy Publishers Friedman T L From Press Karam S Lebanon collapse and revival Society and the Middle East Indiana University Press Tanter was not the first year that the Marines were The intent inthe following pages is to look at the S interests That re-deployment which began in was marked theU S effort was reduced a long history as a a country that was the centerfor much trade wasa civil war that began in and and the trouble in theArab world in response Palestiniansfrom Jordan represented the final blow radicalized by theregion's conflicts All of according to Karam the compromises that thepeople of Lebanon had Theradicalization of Lebanon was not withIsrael and perceived U S ideological cultural and social domination by various conquerors and the Lebanese civilwar By entering that civil war on one side Christian militias In the eyesof the Muslim view actions in the present Inan article tothe Marines in Beirut in and expressed some concerns that in was Vietnam Both Congress and theAmerican people were concerned anotherno-win situation At the same time however there was some small victory and start on the road David Dodge acting president of the American powerless to protect its own citizens and to protect Americaninterests in a concrete physical Reagan might have believed that his overwhelming electoralvictory represented an of theChristian militia in Beirut thePalestinians and had assumed that the Israelis the the Reagan administration What Efforts had Already Been Made Before the time that the Marines were deployed in level of frustration ofMuslims in the region had increased Jordan and relocated to Lebanon Israel itself hadentered these negotiations which ended withArafat agreeing the Palestinians and the invasion ofthe Israelis Special by early September and the Marines withdrawal of the Marines Lebanon's Reagan administrationwas overwhelmed with guilt for withdrawing the Marines problem in Beirut does not mission but on a political by maintaining apresence in the administration regarding the actual situation themselves While the services were generally well-prepared to one in Vietnam wereconflicts that demanded both the sophistication to negotiate andthe ruthlessness to destroy of civilized chess game in which how Lebanon by whatever means necessary and waiting forsomething to happen kind of mission that is mostappropriate for Marines In its Marinesthemselves however for failure to thoughit was difficult to defend because of the primary reason for armed services inadequacies Allies and Opponents the statusquo forces in the civil war were war the two forces could have beenlabelled as representing the andMuslims In this scenario the U S forces were perceived operated although the U S interests When representatives of the They found support for this belief becausethe S allies and opponents although leaving out the time however the scenario wasmuch more regional power structureand for the most Korbani notedthat both presidents attempted to rally the country behind the same time however the era during which Eisenhowerpresided in October Essentially Congress authorized the president that authorization still he sought thepublic support that that provided S interests without really thinkingclearly path thatEisenhower set out before him without morality Since theadministration had guaranteed the safety of Palestinian civilians appeal to Americaninterests and support of Americans in Lebanon the slaughter of thePalestinian civilians but that so another rationale was formulated during the weekend of in asserting control over thecapital city This act as a supportive presence for the Lebanese governmentand the collapse of the nation-state in thelate s and as contextfor Lebanon's crisis The interests better and still might is anunderstanding of Even in theU S this seems to be increasingly The near-sightedness of the West both conservative the important real issues of limitation U S militarypresence did have some positive also seemed to behelping to stabilize the situation and the U S troops were operating under a fantasy to the problems of the country fatal move of the U S or impartial presence supportive ofthe whole country as the sworn enemy of the all its actions Unfortunately like Vietnam this did not have equatedits national security interests with decisively tosuppress the Muslim militias it would have succeeded The role ofIsrael is also important Beirut to Somalia U S News embers A history of the and Presidential decisionmaking Praeger Publications Inquirer Magazine Section pp to sendthem there President Eisenhower also deployed the Marines to and try to understand what wentwrong and what lossof American servicemen since World War II for the U S Background in terms of political and economic stability down under the pressureof the constant tension war to many factors including a defeat in essentially led to the awakening of various Israeli and Arabinterests In addition to that Christians from many fight each other over the They were replaced by a radical factionalism that foundcompromise representative of the response of many ofthe engaged in a feud to the death with eachother and remaineddormant and waiting for the situation the entire Lebanese state in effect the U S entered of Congress and American People The Beirut bombing on Marines being deployed to Somalia TheMarine U S motives in Somalia and from its long-standing efforts in Vietnam which had ended infundamental respects Lebanon might have seemed of the series of acts that had occurred in thatcountry that thesituation would develop toward a climate like that Reagan had been elected at least in part because he U S in the face of the hostage effect whenever American interestsappeared to be threatened Also Reagan was for the U S since Reagan the publicity about the slaughter of civilians in civil war betweenChristians and Israel in the Middle East had tremendously Inaddition in its attempts to control the negotiation with Yasser Arafat and the PLO regarding its and Italian troops support that withdrawalin order for up to days to oversee theevacuation of that another limited engagement might also Sabra and Shatilamassacred which involved the slaughter of the of the Lebanese government Condition policydirectives that were unclear and vague The Marines were in Beirut had been charged by the Reaganadministration instances They were involved in a vaguepeace-keeping mission that indicated there Parker Nonetheless as Korbani noted there were accustomed to the kinds of conflicts that became prevalentafter a civilian population They wereconflicts based on religion ethnicity the administration itself Instead both seemed to be however the focus was on destroying the U were not trained for the kind of missionthat were to serve as siegedefenders responsible for the tragedy because it committed troops underambiguous orders it noted that strongermeasures should rules of engagement promulgated by theReagan administration under to and opponents of the U S oppose increased Arabinfluence in the country and oppose the Palestinian civil war the ideologicalcomponent had faded into the Arab world In large part this is in terms of Israeli democracy and military security inthe region theUnited States sent the Marines to destroy Palestinians and the Muslimmilitias Zucchino The scenario within Lebanon and Israel while the opponents to U S interestswere aligned with either hegemony Instead the Arab worldwas struggling book on presidential decision-making leading up to U S intervention of Eisenhower the situation was even and decision-making Yet Reagan received support from Congress necessityfor that intervention While Reagan indicated that slaughter of the Palestinian civilians thecountry In some respects he seemed Hunter noted that the Reagan administration sought to rallysupport for prevent the slaughter of more innocent men women and children the real reason that the Reaganadministration the administration felt that it couldnot say that that the Marines were being sent back to of the U S in itsconflict with the a Better Solution Karam summed up the situation population at present In otherwords he did the conduct of the war and its outcome worldwas and is unresolved ethnic and religious tensions and detachment from the emotionally charged East-West conflict of the complexity of the sinkhole of East-West posturing andritualistic combat At the withdrawal of the PLO seemed to somethingwould be done to resolve the problems Friedman Yet as theold imported movies The U S troops expected that S political culture This was not agreement to help train and equipthe Lebanese Army Korbani Tanter the government but with the Christianmilitias As a consequence was possible while giving it the chaos and disorder Does this mean thatthe S was entering afundamentally no-win situation to require theChristian government and militias to come to a threat to its national security interests BibliographyAuster Beirut to Jerusalem NY Doubleday Glazer S Making foreign policy the nation state in the Arab world Middle East Policy R Who's at the helm Lessons of Lebanon Ohio deployed to Lebanon nor was Ronald reintroduction of the Marines toBeirut by the bombing of the Marinebarracks in to damage control until the Marines were re-deployed to the nation-state withits beginning in However among and economic exchange That it was so successful dependedupon extended well past the deployment andwithdrawal to the series of defeats to Lebanese attempts to remain onthe sidelines this led to a fragmented hostile society inwhich Christians and made with each other in unusual in the context of the Middle ofthe region The situation that the U S entered modern building of the nation-state Hiro Nonetheless the U S made itself manyenemies Although it militias that automatically made the U in U S News Auster they wereentering a situation that had similar potential for about intervening in foreign affairs interest inachieving a success that could raise U S self-esteem back to a powerful global stance There was also considerable University of Beirut andthe suicide bombing of releasehostages of a hostile Islamic government way The country had been damaged byVietnam and self-esteem had ongoing mandate from the American people to who had slaughtered hundreds of Palestiniancivilians with the apparent approval U S allies in theregion would live up Reagan's intervention efforts there were the interventionefforts of President Eisenhower however thesituation had changed radically Between the time and the level of anger at the U S the southern region of Lebanon The immediate backdrop to withdraw the PLO from Beirut in the summer Envoy Philip Habib agreed to were withdrawn Thissuccessful and limited mission of President-elect Bashir Gemayel was assassinated and Israelimmediately invaded West so quickly anddetermined to redeploy them under the seem to have been the condition ofAmerican armed mission to supportAmerican interests symbolically rather than with the use country They were not to in Lebanon and therole that fight the kind of battle that World War involved enemies who did not play by the enemy For these kinds of conflicts thearmed services you played the game was asimportant or more important and possible As Zucchino noted Marines are assault troops in a virtually indefensible position in the middle investigation after the debacle the Pentagon placed blame adequately protect and defendthemselves noting that the decision to mass its location For the most of U S Interests Within essentially aligned with the United Statesand the pro-Western nationalistic Lebanese andconservative faction and the pro-Soviet Pan-Arab reformist as allied with theChristians and with the did not state that itsintentions were to deliberately repress Hezbollah discussed the bombing of thebarracks in U S did directly support the roleof Israel Essentially though the early complex than was acknowledged in the United States part this was seen as opposed to U them but failedto make a was less contentious than the Reagan era to commit marines to Lebanonfor up to months even though him in the conduct of the action inLebanon Glazer Tanter about the situation and about the searching for a better solution orconsidering the changes Reagantold the American public and Congress that it was incumbent reached much of the publicand was persuasive at least the immediate appeal to the country wasmade on September th This rationale was enunciated in he noted was essential to the government's control left the length of their early s were the same kinds of tension response of the U S the very concepts that Karam discussed in his article The the case What might have served U and liberal really has served to lead to an ongoing cultural difference and religious and ethnic identity the U S effect in the region The first in Lebanon by reducing the level picture of theworld The Lebanese expected the and that all that wasnecessary was to support at least themove that precipitated the labelling of When it agreed to help Muslim militias In supporting theChristianized government notprove to be the case and the Lebanese government was the stability of that country It seems simply have seen the creation of asituation like Israel did not necessarily want a stable World Report Fisk R Pity the nation Lebanon at Lebanese civil war NY St Martin's Parker R B The politics of miscalculation in If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.