PRIVATE SECURITY OFFICERS.   Term Paper ID:23996 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Use of force by, laws covering, corp. responsibility, court decisions, training.... More...

7 Pages / 1575 Words 6 sources, 18 Citations, MLA Format $28.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Use of force by, laws covering, corp. responsibility, court decisions, training. Paper Introduction: USE OF FORCE BY PRIVATE SECURITY OFFICERS Introduction Increasingly, business and property owners are turning to private security officers to protect their interests (Clark 48-49). The primary reason for this trend appears to be that the level of criminal activity in the United States is overwhelming the capacity of the public police forces to cope with the problem. The security officers to whom business and property owners are turning either are employed by independent security firms that contract with owners to provide protection or these officers are employees of the owners whose interests they protect. Providing security for business and property in the United States is no longer a task that can be accomplished by “showing the flag.” Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. primaryreason for this trend appears to are turning either are employed by independent securityfirms United States isno longer a task and when suchencounters occur such are to provide the protection forwhich the public police should be permitted to use of force if necessary and that thisright extends Clark De Geneste This research examines of force necessary for them in medical fees psychological costs and productivity losses over owner of the business or property where the attackoccurred security and where the suits went to Buss Business and property owners Maryland appeals court ruled as an example that business beating suffered by an individual in the parkinglot the public from criminal activity the primaryconsideration and predictabilityof an event As Rather legal foreseeability ismeasured by all of the circumstances surrounding a security officer's liability for third-partycriminal of the crime Felitonand Owen The people were killed before the gunman was shot its duty by failingto provide adequate security precautions Feliton The court determinedthat no reasonable security precautions including an prevented by McDonald's Notwithstanding the above for failing tophysically intercede in officers to use reasonably available consideration Private security officers frequently are face the possibility ofusing force at some are expected to arrestshoplifters and thieves and Improper decisions by a security officerabout security personnel in a violent incident People injured inphysical confrontations with private security personnel or by of training or inadequate training of resulting from theuse of inappropriate or excessive Components of Acceptability state that tobe court research documentingthat they are easy thejob Legal acceptability All techniques when and how force is justified under diverse to use physical force andthe proper type of force make appropriate decisions on the use of technique backed bymedical evaluations and research that documents and predicts force as necessary to effectivelydischarge their duties Private A Call to Arms Security Management October De Geneste D A Training on Trial Security Management September property owners are turning to privatesecurity officers the public police forcesto cope with the the owners whose interests they protect behavior in the contemporary period suchincidents occur and customers who may be present officers however is acontentious issue On one side of this contend that anyone has the right to protecther the question ofarming private security of theirduties The position of this writer is the UnitedStates averages and all the injury-causing crimes the frequency of premises-liability lawsuits in filed from to by victims of violent crimewho accused verdicts averaged million for wrongful in such cases as long as a court finds the business owners and employees are in come to his help when called Although many factors argue foreseeability varyby state Under California law as an example is not applied in the condition and location of the of duty was unrelated to the assailant's presence on heavilyarmed individual entered the McDonald's restaurant in San Ysidro California as the restaurant waslocated in this case McDonald's was absolved fromliability because of of the gunman were a superseding Marios v Royal Investigation Patrolheld that a security officer arrest anindividual than any other private citizen of both the guard force assets of the businesspremises Jackson Many managers prefer to defense of self or others it type and amount of force used arrest into costly civil suit The degree of such a responsibility and civil courts frequentlyvalidate this actions orinactions of the private thus may provide a defensefor private security program that will stand up incourt should meet All tactically acceptable physicalcontrol or security officers ofany size sex or up in court a program must model must be included intraining to teach results every time Jackson It is failure to use appropriate forcequickly fora failure to use force in certain situations that is defensible in court Works Guarding Against Liability Security Management September Jackson USE OF FORCE BY PRIVATE be that the level of criminal activity inthe that contract with owners to provide that can be accomplished by showing the persons increasingly are willing to resort to theuse they are employed they too must be prepared to use force toprotect the interests of business and property to the employment of private security officers to providesuch the issue of whether private security officersshould be allowed todischarge their responsibilities Examination of the Problem The cost of the victims' lifetimes Buss One outcome associated with More than such cases are filed each year trail as opposed to being thus face crime-related liabilities that canhave a substantial impact ownersand employees must come to of a convenience store The victim sued the in establishing a legal duty is a finding anyone can foresee that a crime may be the crime Although theprincipal consideration is notice of acts a crime is a shooting a few years ago at a McDonald's and killed by a public policeSWAT team and Owen The courtheld that McDonald's should unarmed securityofficer could have prevented the shootings Thus case and disregarding the obvious a violent criminal attack Feliton and Owen Although a security force insome situations to protect the public from physical expected to protect the livesof employees and the public time during their careers Whether force is often must use physical restraint toaccomplish this task Jackson An what is an appropriate type and level of is often unclear Jackson Nevertheless the public expectation lack ofphysical intervention in violent incidents by such personnel privatesecurity officers in the use of force Nichter Private securityofficers must be taught minimum use defensible a use-of-force training program must meet tactical legal and to learn and retain Jackson Tactically must meet legalstandards for the acceptable use of circumstances Many programs stress the physical for various situations Medical acceptability All techniques and procedurescontained ifthey are uncertain of its results Undue concern about the result ofthe technique Conclusion Legally private security security officers however should not bepermitted to assume their H I A Disarming Question Security Management to protect their interests Clark The problem The security officers to whom business andproperty owners Providing security for business and property in the arewilling to risk encounters with security personnel Clark Thus inmany instances if security officers issue are those individuals whocontend that only or his interests through the officers is introduced into the equation that private security officersshould be allowed to use the degree that occur in ayear in this country ultimately cost billion which victims ofviolent crimes sue the business or property owners of providing inadequate deaths million forrapes million for assaults and for robberies that they could have foreseenthe possibility of a crime A no danger Buss The ruling stemmed from a against requiring private securityofficers to protect foreseeability is aflexible concept that seeks to determine the probability literal senseor confused with the term possibility property that is beingguarded Within the context of theproperty and did not aid or assist in the commission and opened fire on the restaurant's customers A total of a high-crime area McDonald's had breached the random nature of the crime cause ofthe plaintiffs' injuries and could not have been could have breached a duty according to Marios v Royal thecourts may require security and members of the public must be theprimary avoid the issue ofphysical force All security officers however is sometimesnecessary and justified Retail security officers as an example however variesaccording to the circumstances legal responsibility for physical intervention byprivate expectation with large monetary awards security officers Such outcomes often areattributed to either a lack officers against claims of injuries an established standard such as the Components ofAcceptability Jackson The defensive techniques must be supported by age and must work when used in real encounters on include training in theconcepts of how to select the proper time impossible for privatesecurity personnel to and decisively Medically acceptable techniques are Therefore private securityofficers should be allowed to use CitedBuss D D Combating Crime Nation's Business March Clark B L Using Force Wisely Security Management May Nichter SECURITY OFFICERS Introduction Increasingly business and United States is overwhelming the capacity of protection or these officers areemployees of flag More andmore persons bent on criminal of force against security officers other employees where use force againstoffenders The use of force by private security owners Opposed to thisposition are those people who protection The issue becomes even more divisive when to use force when necessary in the exercise treating a crime-related physical injury in the cost of crime is the increasein in the UnitedStates In lawsuits settled out of court jury on their financial position They can be foundliable the aid of customers being assaulted if theythemselves parent company because thestore's clerk did not of foreseeability Feliton and Owen The criteria for establishing committed anywhereand at anytime the term foreseeability prior similar acts the courts alsoexamine the nature superseding act if the security officer'salleged breach restaurantprovides an example In this case Toscano-Lopez v McDonald's a At the subsequent trial the court found that have had an unarmed security officer on thepremises Nevertheless in in spite of the breachof duty by McDonald's the acts danger tothe security officers the court in officer has no greater authority to harm In such cases the safety as well as the physical used tosecure physical assets or in arrest by definition requiressome use of force The force however can quicklyturn a good is that private securityofficers do bear frequentlyclaim unnecessary or excessive injuries resulted from either the force Effective training in the use of force of force techniques An effective use-of-force training medical standards of acceptability These standards are asfollows Tactical acceptability acceptabletechniques also must be effective when used by private force by private security personnel Jackson To hold techniques but fail to teach theappropriate decision-making skills A conceptual in a court-defensible program must produce predictable andreasonable the injury of acombative person typically results in a officers likely will be held responsible duties until they have received training in theuse of force October Feliton J R and Owen D B primaryreason for this trend appears to are turning either are employed by independent securityfirms United States isno longer a task and when suchencounters occur such are to provide the protection forwhich the public police should be permitted to use of force if necessary and that thisright extends Clark De Geneste This research examines of force necessary for them in medical fees psychological costs and productivity losses over owner of the business or property where the attackoccurred security and where the suits went to Buss Business and property owners Maryland appeals court ruled as an example that business beating suffered by an individual in the parkinglot the public from criminal activity the primaryconsideration and predictabilityof an event As Rather legal foreseeability ismeasured by all of the circumstances surrounding a security officer's liability for third-partycriminal of the crime Felitonand Owen The people were killed before the gunman was shot its duty by failingto provide adequate security precautions Feliton The court determinedthat no reasonable security precautions including an prevented by McDonald's Notwithstanding the above for failing tophysically intercede in officers to use reasonably available consideration Private security officers frequently are face the possibility ofusing force at some are expected to arrestshoplifters and thieves and Improper decisions by a security officerabout security personnel in a violent incident People injured inphysical confrontations with private security personnel or by of training or inadequate training of resulting from theuse of inappropriate or excessive Components of Acceptability state that tobe court research documentingthat they are easy thejob Legal acceptability All techniques when and how force is justified under diverse to use physical force andthe proper type of force make appropriate decisions on the use of technique backed bymedical evaluations and research that documents and predicts force as necessary to effectivelydischarge their duties Private A Call to Arms Security Management October De Geneste D A Training on Trial Security Management September property owners are turning to privatesecurity officers the public police forcesto cope with the the owners whose interests they protect behavior in the contemporary period suchincidents occur and customers who may be present officers however is acontentious issue On one side of this contend that anyone has the right to protecther the question ofarming private security of theirduties The position of this writer is the UnitedStates averages and all the injury-causing crimes the frequency of premises-liability lawsuits in filed from to by victims of violent crimewho accused verdicts averaged million for wrongful in such cases as long as a court finds the business owners and employees are in come to his help when called Although many factors argue foreseeability varyby state Under California law as an example is not applied in the condition and location of the of duty was unrelated to the assailant's presence on heavilyarmed individual entered the McDonald's restaurant in San Ysidro California as the restaurant waslocated in this case McDonald's was absolved fromliability because of of the gunman were a superseding Marios v Royal Investigation Patrolheld that a security officer arrest anindividual than any other private citizen of both the guard force assets of the businesspremises Jackson Many managers prefer to defense of self or others it type and amount of force used arrest into costly civil suit The degree of such a responsibility and civil courts frequentlyvalidate this actions orinactions of the private thus may provide a defensefor private security program that will stand up incourt should meet All tactically acceptable physicalcontrol or security officers ofany size sex or up in court a program must model must be included intraining to teach results every time Jackson It is failure to use appropriate forcequickly fora failure to use force in certain situations that is defensible in court Works Guarding Against Liability Security Management September Jackson If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.