EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH.   Term Paper ID:23308 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Examines relationship between theory & practice in research in educational policy, effectiveness, collaboration.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 5 sources, 15 Citations, APA Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Examines relationship between theory & practice in research in educational policy, effectiveness, collaboration. Paper Introduction: Educational practice is developed in part through the results of educational research, and an analysis of a number of recent studies shows how theory, research, and practice. Researchers have a strong awareness of the fact that what they develop in an empirical study may lead in time to changes in the classroom or administrative office, and they take this responsibility seriously and consider its ramifications, often in terms of how research should be shaped. A number of theorists indeed conduct what amounts to research on research or on specific aspects of the research process as it is utilized in the educational field. One of the ideas that emerges from a number of theoretical studies is that the experience of teachers itself serves as a form of research and that teachers who are aware of this or who are involved in more direct forms of research benefit Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. Day, C.D. Hargreaves (1996) considers the issue in terms of how the boundariesbetween educational research, policy, and practice are being blurred today. Bresler (1996, June/July). "Two discourses:Researchers and policy-making in higher education." Higher Education 29,385-4 3. (Allison, 1994, 49).In the British case, changes had been made in research by the removal ofhigher education from local authority control and by changes in routes andresponsibility for funding, and similar forces are at work in the Americancontext so that individual experience becomes even more important, as doesthe ability of teachers and teacher educators to convey that experience toothers and so to serve as research tools for a wide variety of people. Valimaa, J. The emphasis was on how to get teachers to heedoutside knowledge and to incorporate it in their practice. Where Valimaa and Westerheuden (1995) feature certain hidden issuesin research, Hargreaves (1996) examines the fit between the teacher andresearch, with the practice and experience of the teacher becoming acentral issue in research that will in time change the practice ofteachers. . References Allison, B. Other benefits are also noted: Another was that research training programs add significantly to the intellectual climate in institutions or departments which, in turn, underpins lively teaching environments. Such researchbecomes more valuable when conveyed to others, who then becomecollaborators in the research and in the subsequent process of policyformation and implementation based on that research. (1994, Spring). Day (1995) extends the issue to teachereducators as well as to teachers and shows how the process of learning isongoing for teachers as for students, with learning being here a termreferring to research and its consequences. . Learningitself has a social dimension. He says thatteachers who are involved in research benefit because they are more likelyto be up-to-date on subject matter and so more likely to offer relevantcurricula. The various theroists agreethat there is a close relationship between theory and practice and that therelationship should be extended. (1996, Spring). The different authors discussed offer different advice on how totransform experience and research into something that can be implemented inthe classroom and in the formation of educational policy. The experience of each teacher is itself aresearch project that needs to be analyzed in precisely that light. A secondparadigm emerged in the mid-198 s and centered on teachers' knowledge, seenas distinct from the earlier paradigm: In traditional knowledge utilization theory, teachers' own knowledge was unhelpful to other educators as a way of understanding teaching because it was unsystematic. It also emphasizes the nature ofexperience as a form of research that shapes future behavior: Because it is action oriented and linked to change it is easy to see why it is an attractive option for teacher educators. Theauthors note that policy makers and researchers have different positionsand interests. Wasser and Bresler (1996) emphasize a different aspect of research,the element of collaboration. "Working in hteinterpretive zone: Conceptualizing collaboration in qualitative researchteams." Educational Researcher 25(5), 5-15.----------------------- 1 "Research in art and design in theUnited Kingdom." Higher Education Review 26(2), 49-65. and D.F. Hargreaves(1996) provides 1 principles for reinventing the nature of andrelationships between the creation of knowledge and knowledge utilizationin education. The authors emphasize team efforts in their discussion, but whatthey say applies to the sort of personal experience referred to by theother theorists noted above. He calls this action research, identifying it asthe study of a social situation that involves the participants themselvesas researchers. Much research today is group research. Moreover, it may be carried out at different levels, so that, whatever the experience of the researcher or would-be researchers, it can contribute both to their growth and the growth of others (Day, 1995, 361). This is a broad view of research that fits with theanalysis offered by Hargreaves (1996) and others noted above and that alsomakes a much more direct connection among the elements of practice,research, and policy formation. . Day focuses on the purposes, prejudices, practices, and contextsof those who teach education. "Transforming knowledge: Blurring theboundaries between research, policy, and practice." Educational Evaluationand Policy Analysis 18(2), 1 5-122. Day (1995) also considers the role of the practice of teachersin developing ideas about that practice for implementing policy changes,and the author specifically examines the matter in terms of qualitativeresearch. (1995). There are social dimensions to theimportant act of interpretation, which the authors state cannot beseparated from issues of values: Feminist research is a rich source of ideas and theories in this realm, alerting us that different ways of constructing knowledge produce different kinds of knowledge. The theorists discussed applythese principles in different contexts with similar results--Valimaa andWesterheuden (1995) consider the issue in terms of application in theNetherlands and Finland and Allison (1996) in England, while the othersrefer to the American context. Hargreaves, A. Teachers, Allisonfinds, learn more by themselves being involved in research. Suchexperience is collaborative in that the students and others who form partof the experience of the individual teacher must be seen as collaborators,willingly or unwillingly. Educational practice is developed in part through the results ofeducational research, and an analysis of a number of recent studies showshow theory, research, and practice. What the authors have tosay about the researcher is useful as well in telling the reader ofeducational research how to judge the outcome by understanding the biasesand positions of the researchers and how the latter may affect the way theresearch is shaped, conducted, and analyzed. Research was also seen to be an important criterion in considering institutional accreditation and course validation. Wasser, J.D. The authors suggest that all research is collaborative--even ifconducted by a lone researcher, it will be interpreted by those who read itlater. "Qualitative research, professional developmentand the role of teacher educators: fitness for purpose." BritishEducational Research Journal 21(3), 357-368. Day wants to promote the idea thatresearch is valuable and necessary and that practice itself is a form ofresearch and development. (Wasser and Bresler, 1996, 6).Other types of research would bring different perspectives to educationalissues. A large number ofpeople may make contributions to a research project even when a loneresearcher is involved. The authors provide a good overall analysis of thedifferent positions a researcher occupies on different levels--local,national, and in the scientific community--and how these positions relateto the development and implementation of policy. He notes that research is a function ofevery teacher and teacher educator. Allison (1994) examines the same issuein the British context and notes how much emphasis is being placed onresearch in the development of educational policy. . Valimaa and Westerheuden (1995) consider specifically how policydiscourse and research discourse meet in contract research in highereducation, and they find that the interplay of these discourses hasconsequences for researchers who must balance conflicting demands. The creation of new paradigms from time to time is noted byHargreaves as having a distinctive role by establishing broad educationalprinciples and creating middle-level organizational frameworks that supportresearch and implementation of its results. It is clear that this sort of research is alwaysvaluable to the individual teacher, who must examine his or her experienceto ascertain the important lessons contained therein. Knowledge utilization was prominent in the 197 s and198 s and sought to establish how university-based research and developmentand its dissemination could be improved so that teachers would make moreextensive use of it. A number of theorists indeed conduct whatamounts to research on research or on specific aspects of the researchprocess as it is utilized in the educational field. One of the ideas thatemerges from a number of theoretical studies is that the experience ofteachers itself serves as a form of research and that teachers who areaware of this or who are involved in more direct forms of research benefitfrom their knowledge and can convey those benefits to others in terms ofthe development of future policy. In the newly emergent study of teachers' knowledge, however, the grounding of that knowledge in the lives of individual teachers, and the particularities of time and place within which they worked, was regarded as a source of great richness, practicality, and strength (Hargreaves, 1996, 1 7).Research in this area focuses on the personal and practical nature ofteachers' knowledge. They note that the popular image of researchis dominated by the figure of the lone researcher, but in fact the researchprocess has a very social nature that is often ignored. Researchers have a strong awareness ofthe fact that what they develop in an empirical study may lead in time tochanges in the classroom or administrative office, and they take thisresponsibility seriously and consider its ramifications, often in terms ofhow research should be shaped. Hargreaves (1996) says he is blurring the boundaries among research,policy, and practice, and Day (1995) does the same thing by showing howthese elements are inter-related. The author examines different paradigms that have been central ineducational research. and L. Westerheuden (1995, June). If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.