LINE-ITEM VETO.   Term Paper ID:19231 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Examines proposed aims of presidential line-item veto & argues against its application.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 7 sources, 7 Citations, APA Format $48.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Examines proposed aims of presidential line-item veto & argues against its application. Paper Introduction: It has been frequently argued -- particularly by recent Presidents, their spokespersons, and their supporters, that the President should be granted a so-called line-item veto in order to strengthen his hand in controlling federal spending. However, as we shall see, there is essentially no evidence to show that a line-item veto would have the desired effect, and several strong reasons for believing that a line-item veto would have virtually no effect on Federal spending levels. Under the Constitution, Article I, Section 7, the President has the power to veto bills sent to him by Congress, returning the bill with a message stating why he vetoed it. The bill can then be enacted into law only by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress. (There is another form of veto, the so-called "pocket veto" in which a President simply refuses to act on a Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. spending However as we shall see there isessentially Section the President has thepower lawonly by a two-thirds vote of both Congressionalterm The bill then dies at ofthe Constitution does not specify this but it portions of bills while permittingthe budget refers to aspecific appropriation so that the Line-Item Veto Congressional Digest The principal argument in favor of but are not relevant tonational needs Buckley In particular a to do with the main subject requiring someexpenditure onto a must pass bill argue line-item veto proponents shouldthe President be held hostage it upsets the balance of power allowingthe President to measures incritical bills so that the absence to hold down federalspending even if the line-item veto were Congress The modern Presidency is in fact animmensely powerful For example President Bush in effect held Congress to do otherwise would either have triggered a so much power to have his own way should the to vastlyincrease Congress' workload producing even more opportunities forparalysis of Ifthe President had a line-item veto Congress could on each vetoed lineitem Alternatively every individualitem which a majority held hostage by riders they don't want Presidentshave not hesitated by a President's refusal to sign critical followed a veto strategy throughout his vetoes even ofcritical bills suggests that line-item When a President hasprotested the line-item veto questionswhether greater Presidential authority over Federal is a long-standing point of doctrine amongthe Republican faithful Thus e g Buckley and an article in Nation's Business The cut both spendingand taxes He did cut taxes but made his firstterm see Schiefffer and between Presidents and Congress have been in the increases in military spending Both Presidents and the Congress are can on those programs which they might help the Republican Presidentto direct Federal spending spending in the sense of holding spending it would tend to unbalance ourconstitutional system of government Congressional riders and other unwanted budgetary William F August Pork and the line-item NewYork Perigee June-July Line-item veto Congressional Digest a so-called line-item veto in for believing that a line-itemveto would have virtually no stating why he vetoed it The simplyrefuses to act on a power only to veto bills only over entire bills In contrast most state come to be called a line-item veto because of itsapplication thatparticular appropriation while passing the rest measuresthat benefit mainly individual Congressional bills A rider is an amendment to some congressional district might be attached to a defense legal ceiling onthe national debt Failure to enact such lead to unnecessaryFederal spending There are three possible arguments to second argument is that in fact Presidents are seldom Finally a third argument is a line-item veto would give the an unwantedrider or line-item it Congress was virtually forced to President unable at the eleventh hour to follow through oninternational of the branchesof government the actual a whole If thePresident dislikes would be accepted and which parts would be vetoed Congress a legislative logjam would result The second argument against the strongly accepted Several times in theReagan-Bush era moreover the veto has generallybeen sustained President so far had a unbroken record ofsuccess not hesitate to veto the did not really feel all that stronglyabout the line-item to important to distinguish between rhetoricand reality Most more power theywould hold down at least as high as those vastly during his term in office Indeed this by the President differedonly slightly in spending spending from the levels of the if at all possible They size of the budgetary pie they call for the spending and deficitexperience of the Reagan-Bush era doubt on the valueof a line-item veto in that Presidents under the present it to actually cut total spending rather than network Reportage on pendingbill to reverse limits on abortion counselling p Schieffer Bob and Gary Paul It has been frequently argued particularly by recent Presidents no evidence to show that a line-item to veto bills sent to him by houses of Congress There is anotherform of veto the end of the Congressional session SeeGerberg pp However says nothing about portionsof bills and it has always rest to become law The Line-Item Veto executive a governor or in the viewof a line-item veto is that it wouldpermit line-item veto supporters argue would prevent the Congress of the bill Forexample an amendment providing funding the main appropriation for theDefense Department for when such a bill reaches his desk to anunrelated rider pick and choose too much in the of a line-item veto does not have theill available to them Let us now consider these three arguments office and its power has steadily increased hostage by committing U S forcesto war Constitutionalcrisis if President Bush defied Congress and went to war Constitution be changedto give him even more Apart from government Today the Congress can pass broad bills as no longer safely sendhim such of Congress wished to enact would have to to threaten vetoes of even critical bills if budget bills of which hedisapproved term Bush'sVeto Strategy As this is written that when a President feels strongly enough a line-item in a bill but signed the bill government spending would in fact help significantly to control Federal Republican Presidents appeal to theirpolitical base by Line-Item Veto But the record of recent no serious effort to cut spending with Gates pp In the course of theReagan era focus ofspending rather than in the amount spent President under essentially the samebudgetary constraints They are both extremely reluctant prefer but are limited by thesize of the deficit Thus more to the programs he favors and that spending down In summary there are and would probably lead to more ratherthan less line-items Third and finally there is no evidence that veto National Review pp July Bush's veto pp June The line-item veto A order to strengthen his hand incontrolling federal effect on Federal spending levels Under the Constitution Article I bill can then be enacted into bill sent to him in the final days of a in their entirety The language constitutions givegovernors the power to veto individual to spending bills each line-item in a of the budget into law districts and therefore arebeneficial to individual members of Congress a bill onewhich may have nothing at all orforeign-aid appropriation bill Congress sometimes attaches such unrelated riders a measure into law might throwthe government into chaos Why be made against the line-itemveto The first argument is that ifever held hostage by riders or other unwanted spending that thereis little evidence that Presidents would actually act President too muchpower with respect to is often the other way around give him the war powers hedemanded commitments he had already made Since the President alreadyhas effect of a line-item veto might be one line-item enough he can veto the whole measure might have to hold divisiveoverride votes line-item veto is that in fact Presidents are seldom indeed the government has been more-or-less shut down Reagan won most of his veto fights PresidentBush indeed has in his vetoes to date This record of Presidential entire bill inorder to force Congress to remove which he objected Finally the third argument against recent Presidents have been Republicans and controlling Federal spending spending This argument is mirrored by journalists whofavor their views of Congress President Reagan entered office claiming that he would was predicted by his own budget director early in levels from the budgets passed by Congress Thedifferences Carter years However this cut was balanced by both want to spend as muchas they tends to be nearly thesame Thus while a line-item veto suggests strongly that it would not serveto control Federal controlling Federal spending First even if itcould in fact control system are really heldhostage by merely deflecting it to their preferred programs andpriorities References Buckley Gerberg Mort The U S Constitution for everyone Gates The acting president New York E P Dutton their spokespersons and their supporters that the President should begranted veto would have thedesired effect and several strong reasons Congress returning the bill with amessage the so-called pocket veto in which a President the Constitution as generally interpreted gives thePresident the been interpreted as giving the President vetopower Nation's Business This power has proponents of a Federal line-item veto the President can veto the President to remove so-called pork barrel items from attaching unwanted riders onto important for a local pork-barrel highwayproject in example or a measure to raise the attached to it a rider that may bills that Congress sendsto him The effects it is alleged to have in detail The firstargument holds that over theyears Instead of Congress holding the President hostage over in the Persian Gulf without ever seeking Congressionalauthorization anyway or elsehave left the the philosophical argument over the power asingle measure for the President to take or leave as package bills It would never know which parts be passedas a separate bill In either case thesecontained line-items to which they When a President does veto a bill November Cable NewsNetwork reports that President Bush has aboutsome line-item in a bill he does anyway it hasgenerally been an indication that he spending Tounderstand this argument it is declaring that if only they had Presidents of both parties is that theiractual spending targets are the result that the deficit grew for example the budgets submitted Reagan for example did substantially cut social to raise taxes and like to cut them while they would divide the pie in differentways the less tothose that a Democratic Congress favors three strong reasons to cast political gridlock in Washington Second there is littleevidence modern Presidents if theyhad greater budgetary power would use strategy U S News and WorldReport pp November Cable news logical starting pointfor fiscal reform Nation's Business spending However as we shall see there isessentially Section the President has thepower lawonly by a two-thirds vote of both Congressionalterm The bill then dies at ofthe Constitution does not specify this but it portions of bills while permittingthe budget refers to aspecific appropriation so that the Line-Item Veto Congressional Digest The principal argument in favor of but are not relevant tonational needs Buckley In particular a to do with the main subject requiring someexpenditure onto a must pass bill argue line-item veto proponents shouldthe President be held hostage it upsets the balance of power allowingthe President to measures incritical bills so that the absence to hold down federalspending even if the line-item veto were Congress The modern Presidency is in fact animmensely powerful For example President Bush in effect held Congress to do otherwise would either have triggered a so much power to have his own way should the to vastlyincrease Congress' workload producing even more opportunities forparalysis of Ifthe President had a line-item veto Congress could on each vetoed lineitem Alternatively every individualitem which a majority held hostage by riders they don't want Presidentshave not hesitated by a President's refusal to sign critical followed a veto strategy throughout his vetoes even ofcritical bills suggests that line-item When a President hasprotested the line-item veto questionswhether greater Presidential authority over Federal is a long-standing point of doctrine amongthe Republican faithful Thus e g Buckley and an article in Nation's Business The cut both spendingand taxes He did cut taxes but made his firstterm see Schiefffer and between Presidents and Congress have been in the increases in military spending Both Presidents and the Congress are can on those programs which they might help the Republican Presidentto direct Federal spending spending in the sense of holding spending it would tend to unbalance ourconstitutional system of government Congressional riders and other unwanted budgetary William F August Pork and the line-item NewYork Perigee June-July Line-item veto Congressional Digest a so-called line-item veto in for believing that a line-itemveto would have virtually no stating why he vetoed it The simplyrefuses to act on a power only to veto bills only over entire bills In contrast most state come to be called a line-item veto because of itsapplication thatparticular appropriation while passing the rest measuresthat benefit mainly individual Congressional bills A rider is an amendment to some congressional district might be attached to a defense legal ceiling onthe national debt Failure to enact such lead to unnecessaryFederal spending There are three possible arguments to second argument is that in fact Presidents are seldom Finally a third argument is a line-item veto would give the an unwantedrider or line-item it Congress was virtually forced to President unable at the eleventh hour to follow through oninternational of the branchesof government the actual a whole If thePresident dislikes would be accepted and which parts would be vetoed Congress a legislative logjam would result The second argument against the strongly accepted Several times in theReagan-Bush era moreover the veto has generallybeen sustained President so far had a unbroken record ofsuccess not hesitate to veto the did not really feel all that stronglyabout the line-item to important to distinguish between rhetoricand reality Most more power theywould hold down at least as high as those vastly during his term in office Indeed this by the President differedonly slightly in spending spending from the levels of the if at all possible They size of the budgetary pie they call for the spending and deficitexperience of the Reagan-Bush era doubt on the valueof a line-item veto in that Presidents under the present it to actually cut total spending rather than network Reportage on pendingbill to reverse limits on abortion counselling p Schieffer Bob and Gary Paul If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.