SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT.   Term Paper ID:18277 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Individual school-oriented management rather than district-oriented centralization. Pros & cons of restructuring.... More...

7 Pages / 1575 Words 7 sources, 11 Citations, APA Format $28.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Individual school-oriented management rather than district-oriented centralization. Pros & cons of restructuring. Paper Introduction: School-Based Management The issue of school-based management, as a part of the numerous reform activities occurring during the late 1970s and 1980s, represents a somewhat radical departure from the traditional ways in which schools are perceived. That is, rather than proposing that schools should remain in centralized districts engendering uniformity of planning, budgeting, and staff functions, educators and researchers alike have called for reforms that bring much of the administrative activity to the local school site. In addition to these actors, parents and other community members have become more active in their lobbying efforts to have more autonomy made possible at the building level. At issue has been that the public schools have undergone widespread failure in their attempts to adequately educate Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. (1989, February). Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 2 -2 5. (1989,November). Arguments/Findings against Restructuring There are several arguments that are against the use ofrestructuring, or school-site management (Barnes & Leslie, 1988). 29) note that school-site management affords the local schooldecentralized planning, budgeting, in addition to an enhanced form ofaccountability. A clearly integral component of the careersatisfaction of teachers was the manner in which the principal conductedproblem-solving. School Administrator, 1 , 8-11, 14-15. The utilization of school-sitemanagement, as one means of attaining said improvement, of necessity bringswith it both positives and negatives. The process provided the trainees entailed: theassessment of administrators' personal preferences and styles; profiling ofthe work environment; assistance with the creation of an environmentfostering team efforts; strengthening of administrators in problem-solvingand solution implementation; and the development of a team approach inschool and district leadership. Further, this training program is being used on a nationwide basisto engender enhanced leadership and supervision styles among schooladministrators in an effort to facilitate school-site management. As a result, they could thendiscuss and approach educational issues in positive and nonthreateningways. Barnes and Leslie (1988) indicate subsequent to the conduct of theExcellence in Education training program in Oakland that the trainees beganto use the team approach to accomplish district and school goals. EducationalAdministration Quarterly, 25(1), 58-81. Atkin (1989) also indicates that successful school reform at anylevel, as per numerous studies, must of necessity entail independence forteachers. 29) indicate that the disadvantages of school-sitemanagement include: the lack of uniform policies; poor logisticalcoordination among schools; competition and rivalry among schools that maydetract from invaluable administrative time; unambiguous authoritystructures; inconsistent management operations; management operations thatare not sufficiently grounded in formal training and/or theory; the lack ofdivision of labor among specialists in curriculum, testing, and otherfields; and the lack of cost savings resulting from elimination ofduplicated services and/or activities. Hawley, W.D. Lane, J.J.. The use of school-site management is one approach thatoffers several promises, given that it does not propose to "fix" theproblems of the education system from the top down, but rather proposes abottom-up remedy. At issue has been that the public schoolshave undergone widespread failure in their attempts to adequately educatestudents. Given therole of the teacher as researcher, a team approach to those problemsneeding investigation, solicitation on the part of school administratorsfor funding with which to conduct research, and the use of goal-orientedresearch, the building level can better utilize research. (1989, November). As to the participants in such decision-making, 99percent of the respondents indicated principals, while 97 percent reportedteachers. Further, the statement of the problem,literature background, and research design of all educational research mustinsure that the findings are applicable to both the classroom and theschool, as opposed to the current more esoteric findings that have littlesignificance to these areas. Further, the United States is steadily losing its competitivestanding in the international community due for the most part to theinappreciable manner in which students are being educated. In disagreeing with the findings of the National Policy Boardfor Educational Administration's report entitled "Improving the Preparationof School Administrators: An Agenda for Reform, Hawley contends that thetype of leadership style used by the school administrator is of moreimportance than the content of the doctoral degree curriculum, or otherexternal environments. Why educational research can't keepup with reform. (1989, November). Given the control over their own planning and budgetingfunctions, local schools thus engender a balance being struck betweenschool autonomy and the control had by the central office. Conley, S.C., Bacharach, S.B., & Bauer, S. Atkin (1989) reports that, although educational research cannot keepapace with reforms, there are indicated remedies by which schooladministrators can literally enhance school-site management relative to theprovision of education in a manner that is superior to that provided bydistricts. A program to improve localschool site management. Further,there has been considerable drop-out among secondary school students, anincreasing flood of teachers leaving the teaching profession, and a risingnumber of strikes by teachers and other school staff. & Walberg, H.J. This attribute is not any different,however, from that addressing the traditional form of school district andschool organization. & Leslie, M. Administrator opinions on school-based management. The use ofthe school-site management approach, which attempts to balance authoritywith responsibility, would clearly contribute to teacher careersatisfaction. (1987). That is, if the principal used methods of problem-solvingthat evidenced restrained authority augmented by enhanced responsibility,teachers were found to be more dissatisfied with their careers. An additional issue is that schooladministrators be thoroughly versed in the research that is relevant totheir needs regarding the implementation of school-site management. There has also been reported widespread deterioration of studentachievement, declining standards and expectations for student performance,and inadequate requirements for those in the teaching profession. In essence, thegovernance of schools by the school board appears to have for the most partfailed. Proposals ignore problems inadministrator preparation. Those teachers who are most dissatisfied with their careers tendto work in schools in which they have negligible autonomy, authority, andinput into the decision-making process. Here, educators must petition and lobby for additional fundswith which to have educational research conducted: their activity in thisrealm must become more pronounced. Arguments/Findings in Favor of Restructuring There are several arguments that are in favor of the use ofrestructuring, or school-site management (Chubb, 1987). Given this training, the traineesevidenced increased levels of trust, reduction in misconceptions, andincreased focus of their responsibilities. Statement of the Problem The utilization of restructuring (i.e., school-based management)represents a constructive means by which school administrators, teachers,students, parents, the community, and other interested actors canconcertedly act in the formation of a collaborative effort towards theprovision of education. Thus, it isconceivable that such training would re-focus school administrators on thedistrict-wide perspective, as opposed to school-site perspectives. (1989, November). Hawley (1989) agrees with the importance of leadership style andsupervision style, as components of administrator preparation, indicatingthat the manner in which the school administrator is prepared will ofnecessity dictate how effectively his or her school is administered. Schooladministrators must be provided formal training at the master's and/ordoctoral level(s) that engenders) in them significant consideration ofresearch in the discipline of education, as well as other disciplines in aneffort to attain an integrated approach. Further, thereare other advantages to this approach, including: the opportunity to focuson a manageable scope of operations; the use of vested decision-making;increased parent-school participation; and, more responsive curriculumdevelopment. ExecutiveEducator, 11, 15-18. Conley, Bacharach, and Bauer (1989, p. (1988, Fall). School-Based Management The issue of school-based management, as a part of the numerousreform activities occurring during the late 197 s and 198 s, represents asomewhat radical departure from the traditional ways in which schools areperceived. Chubb, J.E. Lane andWalberg (1989, p. In addition, decentralized communication, one of the resultsof school-site management, would make for fewer and less seriouscommunication breakdowns, resulting in ill-informed policies, and theprevalence of autocratic management extended only to a few elites. In contrast, 7 percent of the respondents reported thatparents, building staff members, the superintendent, and principals shouldbe included in school-site management decisions. The response to this nationwide tragedy, school reform, has proposednumerous approaches to the ways in which the education system as a wholecan be repaired. ERS Spectrum, 6, 26-28. Inparticular, they began to place more emphasis on the importance of district-wide responsibilities, in addition to school responsibilities. A foremost concern is that educational researcheither be conducted by educators (preferably teachers and schooladministrators), or by social scientists working in conjunction witheducators. As well, there iscurrently an alarming increase underway of students at risk for a varietyof reasons, numerous students are being denied equal opportunity to learn,and student preparation for the work-force is markedly less than what itshould be. This,in turn, will clearly impact the success or failure of school-sitemanagement. Heller, Woodworth, Jacobson, and Conway (1989) report subsequent tothe conduct of a study on the opinions of administrators on school-basedmanagement that, overall, school administrators agree that participativedecision-making is indicated in order to achieve more effective schools.Of the 1,5 9 responses, 87 percent of the respondents indicated that schooldecisions are best made at the building level. Heller, R.W., Woodworth, B.E., Jacobson, S.L.. Further, 96 percent of theprincipals in this study indicated that those professionals in individualschools should make the more important decisions, as opposed to 8 percentof the superintendents. That is, rather than proposing that schools should remain incentralized districts engendering uniformity of planning, budgeting, andstaff functions, educators and researchers alike have called for reformsthat bring much of the administrative activity to the local school site.In addition to these actors, parents and other community members havebecome more active in their lobbying efforts to have more autonomy madepossible at the building level. Barnes and Leslie (1988) indicate subsequent to the conduct of theExcellence in Education training program in Oakland, for which 8 of 24 school administrators and six school cluster directors managing 15 schoolseach received training on effective team-building practices, that the useof school-site management would result in increased focus on theadministrative function, with particular emphasis being placed on theleadership style, supervision style, and the decision-making process of theschool administrator. Lane and Walberg(1989, p. The dilemma of public school improvement.Paper presented as part of the Dartmouth College Spoor Dialogues onLeadership, 1-35. Second isthat teachers be perceived as the most effective conductors of educationalresearch. National Association of Secondary School Principals, 29-36.----------------------- 9 Those variables that were investigated included: roleambiguity; routinization; authority; influence deprivation; contact withsupervisors; positive supervisory behavior; negative supervisory behavior;certainty of promotion; rationality of promotion; manageable class size;absence of student learning problems; and absence of student behaviorproblems. References Atkin, J.M. 58) report that the presenceof school-site management, as an integral component of the workenvironment, may well positively influence the career satisfaction ofteachers. Thus, he advances the notion that school-sitemanagement would not be necessary, given the appropriate form and use ofleadership among school administrators. For the secondary school, teachers, thefindings were similar. For the elementary school teachers, role ambiguity;routinization; authority; influence deprivation; positive supervisorybehavior; rationality of promotion; and, absence of student behaviorproblems proved significant. Theschool work environment and teacher career dissatisfaction. Site-managed schools: The Chicago plan. Further, given such leadership,student learning and building staff satisfaction would be increased, aswell as parent satisfaction with educational outcomes, thereby obviatingthe need for such educational reform. Third is that those theoretical frameworks espoused by socialscientists must foster the effective application of findings to theclassroom as well as the overall operation of the school itself. & Conway, J.A. Barnes, B. Foremost is that the agenda of the professional researcher beshaped to parallel those of school administrators and teachers. Personal Synthesis Given the state of the quality of education provided our students,particularly at the elementary and secondary levels, there is clearly aneed for improvement in schools. Of these disciplines,administration is integral. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.